A trail of dirt still links the Washington Post to Saudi Arabia. Yes, even now.

Khashoggi and Washington Post logo
Support us and go ad-free

It’s been almost two weeks since Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi disappeared. After walking into the Saudi Arabian consulate in Istanbul on 2 October, the critic of Saudi crown prince Mohammed bin Salman didn’t walk back out. And Khashoggi’s likely murder has received global condemnation – not least from writers at the Washington Post. But there’s still a trail of dirt that links the Washington Post to Saudi Arabia. Even now.

The Washington Post’s payroll

On 15 October, the Intercept’s Glenn Greenwald revealed that the Post “continues to pay and publish undisclosed Saudi lobbyists and other regime propagandists”.

Those Saudi lobbyists still on the Post’s payroll include Carter Eskew. His Glover Park Group, writes Greenwald, “is the second-most active lobbying firm for the Saudi regime”, earning $150,000 per month. The Glover Park Group is a strategic communications and government affairs firm. It claims that it looks “for people who are driven by the desire to be involved in the most pressing issues of the day”. It has nonetheless remained conspicuously silent on the pressing issue of Khashoggi’s likely murder.

Eskew’s last article for the Post was published on 12 October – over a week after Khashoggi’s disappearance. This was Eskew’s third article since Khashoggi’s disappearance. Eskew, moreover, remains scheduled to attend a major public relations and investment conference in the Saudi capital, Riyadh.

Another columnist, Ed Rogers, also holds strong ties to the Saudi regime. Rogers is the chairman of BGR group, which is contracted to “assist the Saudis in communicating priority issues regarding US-Saudi relations to American audiences including the media and policy communities”. Rogers, who “handles the Saudi work”, last published for the Washington Post on 12 October.

That Eskew and Rogers remain on the Washington Post’s payroll must horrify Khashoggi’s former colleagues and friends.

Jeff Bezos, meanwhile…

Washington Post owner and world’s richest man Jeff Bezos has similarly shared close ties with the Saudi crown prince. In March 2018, he hosted the crown prince in Seattle, during which time they discussed technology and laughed together. Bin Salman has also met with the likes of Bill Gates, former US presidents, and Richard Branson.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

But unlike Virgin Group founder Richard Branson, Bezos so far seems unwilling to sever ties with Saudi Arabia. After the news of Khashoggi’s disappearance, Branson suspended business links with the country. Bezos, on the other hand, does not yet appear to have released any press statement on the matter.

International opposition to Saudi brutality – in Yemen in particular – is a long time coming. Now, people have the opportunity to use Khashoggi’s disappearance to pressure British and US politicians, journalists, and corporations to sever ties with the country. This might be the last chance to prevent total catastrophe in Yemen.

Get Involved!

– See the companies and individuals still planning to attend Saudi Arabia’s ‘Future Investment Initiative’ – and decide whether they’re worthy of your support. You can also contact them to share your concerns.

Ask the Washington Post why Saudi lobbyists are still on its payroll.

Write to your local MP about ongoing British military assistance to Saudi Arabia.

– Read more of our in-depth coverage of Saudi Arabia.

Support The Canary if you appreciate the work we do.

Featured image via YouTube/Washington Post

Support us and go ad-free

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us

Comments are closed