Lewis dismisses claims about victims’ payment funding

Brandon Lewis & Conor Murphy
Support us and go ad-free

Secretary of state for Northern Ireland Brandon Lewis has dismissed claims from Stormont’s finance minister that he does not have the money to fund a victims’ payment scheme.

Conor Murphy asserted that the Executive coffers will not stretch to cover the costs of the scheme, which seeks to compensate people injured during the 1968-98 conflict. But Lewis, who said the first year of the scheme could cost under £29 million, highlighted that the Executive had an underspend of millions in the current financial year.


The remarks come amid an ongoing stand-off between the Northern Ireland Office and Stormont Executive over who will foot a potential £1.2 billion total bill for the delayed payments for those injured during the conflict.

Earlier this month, the Court of Appeal in Belfast ruled that Stormont had a legal duty to fund the payment scheme for injured victims of the conflict. It made no finding on the source of that funding. Instead it gave the Executive and Northern Ireland Office four weeks to agree a solution.

During the ongoing impasse, Lewis has singled out Murphy and Sinn Féin for criticism. On Wednesday, the Northern Ireland secretary again criticised the Stormont minister.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

He told BBC Radio Ulster:

With a £15 billion (Treasury) block grant from the year where they’ve had an underspend, that they can’t find the few million pound they need to find for what is a priority, what’s been a legal commitment, what has been there since 2014, for the Sinn Féin Department of Finance minister to continue to delay this is untenable. How can he stand there and say with any kind of credibility that from a £15 billion block grant approximately, that he is not prepared to make decisions to allocate a few million pounds to the victims’ payment scheme that they are committed to since 2014?”

Lewis’ comments came after his Tuesday meeting with Murphy, first minister Arlene Foster, deputy first minister Michelle O’Neill and justice minister Naomi Long to discuss the funding dispute.

Fiscal Council could provide “transparency”

The Conservative MP said the situation emphasised the need for the finance minister to press ahead with setting up a delayed independent spending oversight body.

Stormont parties committed to establishing a Fiscal Council in the New Decade, New Approach deal to restore powersharing. The independent body, which was supposed to be set up by July last year, was designed to conduct an annual assessment of the Executive’s plans to balance its budget. It would also examine the ongoing sustainability of departmental finances and assess the effectiveness of long-term efficiency measures.

Lewis said such a council could provide “transparency” on Murphy’s claims that there are not sufficient funds to pay for the victims’ scheme.

“Dithering and delay”

But Murphy disputed Lewis’s position, and also said the first year estimate is as high as £145 million. Accusing Lewis of “dithering and delay”, Murphy said the UK Government should pay for the scheme because it legislated for it as Westminster. he said:

The Victims Payment Scheme was designed at Westminster and policy decisions were taken there

He added:

Funding for it also needs to come from there.

The Executive’s budgets are already stretched and the pension could amount to costs of up to £1.2 billion.

Therefore it is disappointing that Mr Lewis continues to claim that the pension will cost £28 million in the first year when he knows that the Government Actuary’s Department has estimated the cost at between £70 million and £145 million in the first year.

It is time the British Government acted to pay for the scheme it created so that victims should not have to face any further delays.

“Our legal duty”

Arlene Foster, meanwhile, has made clear that victims will get their payments, regardless of who ultimately funds them.

She told BBC Radio Ulster on Wednesday:

It’s important to say to people this morning, regardless of where the money comes from, whether it comes from the Executive or from the British Government, that the Executive will be paying the money when it falls due because that is our legal duty and it’s very important to say that.

The Executive has recently received costing predictions from the government’s Actuary Department based on numbers provided by the Executive Office.

Those range from £600 million to £1.2 billion for the lifetime of the scheme, with a central estimate of £848 million.

The scheme should have been open for applications at the end of May last year. It was first delayed when Sinn Féin refused to designate a Stormont department to administer it. The party objected to government eligibility criteria that excluded former paramilitaries convicted of causing serious harm.

O’Neill eventually agreed to nominate a department last August following a highly critical court judgment that found she had been acting unlawfully.

However, the separate stand-off involving the Government and the wider Stormont Executive over funding remains unresolved.

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us