The House of Lords has voted consistently against the wishes of Brexiteers. Media outlets and MPs like Jacob Rees-Mogg have cried out against this ‘undemocratic’ behaviour. But the irony is we had an opportunity to democratise the Lords several years ago, and many Brexiteers voted against it.
It is not a loved institution, it is a tolerated institution when it obeys the constitutional norms, if it ignores them it has very little support left. They are completely obsessed by the European Union. They are people who have devoted their whole life to it. Their whole aim is to stop Brexit.
Leading Tory MPs call on a ‘complete and total overhaul’ of the House of Lords after its votes to thwart Brexit
While the Daily Mail newspaper went even further:
Read on...Support us and go ad-free
But what did the Mail think about the Lords when there was an opportunity to reform the upper house?
In 2012, there were plans to create a mostly elected House of Lords. Here are some Mail Online headlines from the time:
People have picked up on the irony:
Hey, does anyone know if the Mail has taken a different position on Lords reform in the past?
— Matt Chorley (@MattChorley) May 10, 2018
Glorious contrast between tonight’s Mail splash (calling for Lords reform) and a Mail editorial from 2012 (arguing against Lords reform)
— Jim Pickard (@PickardJE) May 9, 2018
91 Tory MPs opposed reforms. Among them were several MPs who are now prominent Brexiteers. This list includes:
- Jacob Rees-Mogg.
- Philip Davies.
- David Davis.
- Louise Mensch.
- Nadine Dorries.
- John Redwood.
- Bernard Jenkin.
At the time, Jenkin questioned the need to replace the:
current effective, proven and appointed House with more elected politicians
Here’s an article Jenkin penned for the Sun on 21 April:
In that article, Jenkin asks:
What happens in a democracy if the politicians just ignore the views of the people?
This is an important point. But Jenkin isn’t the best person to make it. In 2012, when the government had a chance to reform the House of Lords, a poll found that:
- 33% of the population favoured a fully-elected chamber.
- 41% wanted a partially-elected chamber.
- A mere 5% wanted to maintain a fully-appointed chamber.
So it looks like these MPs only follow the will of the people when it suits them.
Democracy when it’s convenient
This problem of supporting the Lords as and when it’s convenient isn’t unique to the Tories. Labour’s Jess Phillips recently wrote this article:
Phillips hasn’t changed her mind completely, but sums up by saying:
When the revolution comes I will still be tearing up the ermine and painting over the gold with a nice magnolia. I do not believe power can be bestowed, no matter how good you are at science, or who your dad was. But for now I fight the war in front of me, and it seems I have some very unlikely allies.
It’s this sort of attitude that often gets in the way of significant change, though. And as the Brexiteers have found out, supporting an undemocratic body when it suits you can backfire.
– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.
Featured image via YouTubeSupport us and go ad-free
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.