The House of Lords has voted consistently against the wishes of Brexiteers. Media outlets and MPs like Jacob Rees-Mogg have cried out against this ‘undemocratic’ behaviour. But the irony is we had an opportunity to democratise the Lords several years ago, and many Brexiteers voted against it.
It is not a loved institution, it is a tolerated institution when it obeys the constitutional norms, if it ignores them it has very little support left. They are completely obsessed by the European Union. They are people who have devoted their whole life to it. Their whole aim is to stop Brexit.
Continue reading below...
Leading Tory MPs call on a ‘complete and total overhaul’ of the House of Lords after its votes to thwart Brexit
While the Daily Mail newspaper went even further:
But what did the Mail think about the Lords when there was an opportunity to reform the upper house?
In 2012, there were plans to create a mostly elected House of Lords. Here are some Mail Online headlines from the time:
People have picked up on the irony:
Hey, does anyone know if the Mail has taken a different position on Lords reform in the past?
— Matt Chorley (@MattChorley) May 10, 2018
Glorious contrast between tonight’s Mail splash (calling for Lords reform) and a Mail editorial from 2012 (arguing against Lords reform)
— Jim Pickard (@PickardJE) May 9, 2018
91 Tory MPs opposed reforms. Among them were several MPs who are now prominent Brexiteers. This list includes:
- Jacob Rees-Mogg.
- Philip Davies.
- David Davis.
- Louise Mensch.
- Nadine Dorries.
- John Redwood.
- Bernard Jenkin.
At the time, Jenkin questioned the need to replace the:
current effective, proven and appointed House with more elected politicians
Here’s an article Jenkin penned for the Sun on 21 April:
In that article, Jenkin asks:
What happens in a democracy if the politicians just ignore the views of the people?
This is an important point. But Jenkin isn’t the best person to make it. In 2012, when the government had a chance to reform the House of Lords, a poll found that:
- 33% of the population favoured a fully-elected chamber.
- 41% wanted a partially-elected chamber.
- A mere 5% wanted to maintain a fully-appointed chamber.
So it looks like these MPs only follow the will of the people when it suits them.
Democracy when it’s convenient
This problem of supporting the Lords as and when it’s convenient isn’t unique to the Tories. Labour’s Jess Phillips recently wrote this article:
Phillips hasn’t changed her mind completely, but sums up by saying:
When the revolution comes I will still be tearing up the ermine and painting over the gold with a nice magnolia. I do not believe power can be bestowed, no matter how good you are at science, or who your dad was. But for now I fight the war in front of me, and it seems I have some very unlikely allies.
It’s this sort of attitude that often gets in the way of significant change, though. And as the Brexiteers have found out, supporting an undemocratic body when it suits you can backfire.
– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.
Featured image via YouTube
Since you're here ...
We know you don't need a lecture. You wouldn't be here if you didn't care.
Now, more than ever, we need your help to challenge the rightwing press and hold power to account. Please help us survive and thrive.