Local councils have warned that turning offices into flats is actually making the housing crisis worse

Churchill Plaza, Basingstoke, which was converted from offices to flats using permitted development rights

The Local Government Association (LGA) said on 27 November that government rules on housing are “exacerbating” the shortage of affordable housing. A bill allowing fast-tracked conversion of office space into housing isn’t subject to affordable housing obligations. As a result, the body for local councils claims more than 10,000 affordable houses may have been lost in the scramble for new homes.

‘Temporary’ measure

Permitted development rights were introduced in May 2013. They removed the need for full planning permission on a range of developments, including conversions of offices into flats. At first the change was claimed to be temporary in an attempt to quickly boost the number of available houses. But in 2016 this fast-tracking was made permanent.

There was opposition from the outset. In October 2015, for example, the Town and Country Planning Association said the changes meant “local communities will have even less say over how their neighbourhoods are developed.” The LGA was also critical from the start. It said in October 2015 that, in some cases, the law had already seen “office space… replaced with homes which do not meet community needs and remain unaffordable”.

Three years on, these warnings appear to be borne out by the LGA’s latest warning.

No obligations

Since 2015 there have been 42,130 flats created from office conversions. None of these, however, are subject to Section 106 agreements. According to homelessness charity Shelter this means:

that planning authorities can no longer impose affordable housing obligations on these conversions. Additionally, planning authorities cannot impose space standards on these conversions.

Consequently, affordable housing doesn’t account for any of these conversions. These developments also haven’t included key supporting infrastructure such as roads, schools or health services. In other words, at the expense of local communities, developers have been able to focus on profit.

Read on...

The total number of conversions accounts for only 7% of new homes. But there’s a tendency for such developments to bunch together. The LGA said they account for 40% of new homes in some locations, including Derby, Croydon and Islington. And local communities have felt the impact.

On 19 November, former housing minister Nick Raynsford said in a review of the system that:

We ignore at our peril the anger and disaffection felt by so many communities at the failure of current planning policies and procedures to listen to their concerns and respond to their needs.

Meanwhile, Shelter described permitted development rights as “lowering the bar for homes in England”.

Despite this, the government is looking at ways of expanding it. Proposals include allowing upward extensions and the demolition of commercial properties for housing without need for regular planning permissions.

We have no say

The focus on affordable housing is problematic. The term refers to properties priced at up to 80% of local market rates. That means so-called affordable homes are often well beyond what many can afford. It’s the wider impact of permitted development rights that is an issue.

Martin Tett, spokesperson for LGA, highlighted the heart of the problem:

Permitted development rules are taking away the ability of local communities to shape the area they live in… It is vital that councils and local communities have a voice in the planning process.

The ability for private companies to bypass local accountability is the problem here. It’s yet another way for profit-driven private interests to make short-term gains out of the housing crisis. And it’s at the cost of local communities.

Featured image via Geograph © Andrew Smith (cc-by-sa/2.0)

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us