In two minutes, James O’Brien brilliantly exposes the British media’s hypocrisy on antisemitism

James O'Brien on LBC
Support us and go ad-free

Love or loathe him, LBC’s James O’Brien brilliantly critiqued the media on 6 March. By using a simple thought experiment, O’Brien highlighted the media’s obvious double standards concerning alleged racism within the Labour and Conservative Parties.

The Conservative Party is ‘institutionally’ Islamophobic

O’Brien was reacting to news that the Conservative Party has suspended 14 members for allegedly making Islamophobic comments. Conservative Baroness, Sayeeda Warsi, has also said that the Conservative Party has an “institutional” problem with Islamophobia.

O’Brien contrasted the media’s treatment of antisemitism to Islamophobia:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

O’Brien asked his listeners:

Imagine if Diane Abbott or John McDonnell came forward with comments about Jewish women being like letterboxes, or made a joke about the wigs that orthodox Jewish women wear. Made a joke that invited people to mock and condemn them.

The letterbox remark is a reference to comments made by Conservative MP, Boris Johnson, about women wearing the burqa.

“Utterly upside down”

O’Brien continued:

Imagine if John McDonnell made a joke about the wigs that orthodox Jewish women wear, the locks that orthodox Jewish men grow or the yarmulkes that many many many Jewish men choose to wear.

Imagine if, for example, John McDonnell said, ‘Why do all these Jews walk around with frisbees on their head?’

Explain to me how that would be substantively any different to what Boris Johnson said about Muslim women’s sartorial choices, the ones that make them look like letterboxes. Do you see what I mean? That’s not even controversial, that comparison.

Just imagine Owen Jones writing an article about there not being enough antisemitism in the Labour Party and then tell me how the hell Rod Liddle gets to write an article arguing that there’s not enough Islamophobia in the Conservative Party.

And he’ll still get invited on to programmes and into studios. And Andrew Neil can still claim when he’s covering these issues that he’s impartial. And Fraser Nelson can host an event at the Palladium with Jacob Rees-Mogg, whose fans are so vile that 14 of them have been suspended from the very party.

He concluded:

Just swap all of those phrases. Swap Islamophobia for anti-Semitism. Swap Rod Liddle for Owen Jones. Swap Fraser Nelson for Jason Cowley over at the New Statesman and swap Jacob Rees-Mogg or Boris Johnson for John McDonnell or Tom Watson.

And you tell me that we don’t live in a country that is utterly upside down.

O’Brien has a point

As The Canary has argued recently, the media’s bias in focusing on Labour antisemitism is obvious. For example, when the BBC’s political editor, Laura Kuenssberg, finally acknowledged the Conservatives’ Islamophobia, she said it was:

…on a different political scale…

This caused an uproar on social media. Novara Media’s Ash Sarkar said Kuenssberg’s comment created a, “hierarchy of racism”. And many others said it was only on a “different political scale” because the media choose to focus on one story and not the other.

As The Canary also reported, in a comment directed at a Tory MP about Islamophobia, the BBC’s Andrew Neil said:

and because of the row over antisemitism you’ve got away with this.

But the media’s focus on antisemitism isn’t inevitable, it’s a choice. And so Neil should more accurately have said: ‘because we the media have no interest in holding the Conservative Party to the same standards over racism as Labour, we have let you get away with it’.

Is O’Brien guilty of the same bias he criticises?

O’Brien’s comments are welcome. But he is as guilty as anyone for jumping on the media bandwagon and obsessively focusing on Labour antisemitism. He is part of the same media machine that relentlessly whips up hysteria and energises negative narratives about Jeremy Corbyn’s Labour.

But when the media only focus on alleged racism within Labour and not the Conservative Party, they create ‘worthy’ and ‘unworthy’ victims of racism. And they also choose to damage one political party and not another.

Featured image via YouTube – Original Jedi watching

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us