Edinburgh City Council plans to ‘seize’ empty homes to tackle housing crisis

High rise block of flats
Support us and go ad-free

On 31 August, Edinburgh City Council (ECC) announced plans to use Compulsory Purchase Orders (CPOs) to “seize” uninhabited properties. As reported by Edinburgh Evening News, the plan aims to tackle the city’s housing crisis. The council’s “interventionist approach” will force owners to sell unused property to “free up housing stock”. Edinburgh currently has 1,267 properties that have lain empty for over a year and more than 5,000 homes declared vacant for six months or longer.

The members of ECC’s housing and economy committee listened to the concerns of residents who live next to empty properties. These ranged from fly tipping to anti-social behaviour.

Edinburgh City Councillors

SNP councillor Kate Campbell, convener of the Housing and Economy Committee, said:

We heard about the impact on people’s lives and we have an enormous amount of pressure on our housing market in Edinburgh. Bringing homes back into use is really important.

She went on to say:

I’m very pleased with this pro-active response, it’s the first step to getting on and doing something about the problem of long-term empty homes. The committee were keen to be kept informed and I think this shows the level of concern and that we will be monitoring progress.

Scottish Green Party councillor Susan Rae said, in response to these new proposals:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

The council’s willingness to look at compulsory purchase powers for long term empties where the owner is simply not engaging is welcome and overdue. In a city with such acute housing shortages and with such pressure on our precious green spaces, the blight of empty homes must end.

Scottish Conservatives backed the use of CPOs but raised concerns about ECC taking ownership of properties in disrepair. Councillor John McLellan said:

Compulsory Purchase Orders are not necessarily a silver bullet. In those circumstances a CPO would still mean the council would have to pay the market price for that home. That home, even in its dilapidated state, is still going to rake up £350,000 to £400,000 – which the council would have to pay

He went on to say:

The margins in buying that property and then putting it back on the market could actually be quite small for the council.

Featured Image via: Caledonian Spectator/ YouTube

Support us and go ad-free

Do your bit for independent journalism

Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.

We need you to help out, if you can.

When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.

You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.

In return you get:

  • Advert free reading experience
  • Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
  • 20% discount from our shop


The Canary Fund us

Comments are closed