On 31 August, Edinburgh City Council (ECC) announced plans to use Compulsory Purchase Orders (CPOs) to “seize” uninhabited properties. As reported by Edinburgh Evening News, the plan aims to tackle the city’s housing crisis. The council’s “interventionist approach” will force owners to sell unused property to “free up housing stock”. Edinburgh currently has 1,267 properties that have lain empty for over a year and more than 5,000 homes declared vacant for six months or longer.
Edinburgh City Councillors
SNP councillor Kate Campbell, convener of the Housing and Economy Committee, said:
We heard about the impact on people’s lives and we have an enormous amount of pressure on our housing market in Edinburgh. Bringing homes back into use is really important.
She went on to say:
I’m very pleased with this pro-active response, it’s the first step to getting on and doing something about the problem of long-term empty homes. The committee were keen to be kept informed and I think this shows the level of concern and that we will be monitoring progress.
The council’s willingness to look at compulsory purchase powers for long term empties where the owner is simply not engaging is welcome and overdue. In a city with such acute housing shortages and with such pressure on our precious green spaces, the blight of empty homes must end.
Scottish Conservatives backed the use of CPOs but raised concerns about ECC taking ownership of properties in disrepair. Councillor John McLellan said:
Compulsory Purchase Orders are not necessarily a silver bullet. In those circumstances a CPO would still mean the council would have to pay the market price for that home. That home, even in its dilapidated state, is still going to rake up £350,000 to £400,000 – which the council would have to pay
He went on to say:
The margins in buying that property and then putting it back on the market could actually be quite small for the council.
Featured Image via: Caledonian Spectator/ YouTube
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?