Outraged voters are taking a legal bid to the High Court after 10 Tory councillors received thousands of ‘impossible‘ votes in the 2 May local elections. The 10 councillors received over 3,000 votes each, despite only 2,477 people actually voting in the area.
“More votes were recorded than cast”
Democracy for Highworth, a Facebook group set up to publicise the issue, writes:
The community of Highworth is challenging the result of the Town Council election of 2nd May 2019, by legal petition to the High Court.
At this election more votes were recorded than were cast, and at least one candidate not elected who should have been.
The electoral registration officer for the Highworth Parish Council election, Susie Kemp, said it’s
very clear that there has been an error in the numbers given in the declaration of the election… The votes allocated to some candidates are incorrect.
But nonetheless she also said:
I cannot be certain that this has had an impact on the candidates elected as I am unable in law to recount the ballot papers once I have declared the results of the election
Independent candidate Keith Smith told the i:
We cannot be sure that the right people are duly sitting on the council.
Possible ‘block vote system’ error
But Smith offered an explanation, suggesting that the issue could be due to human errors in counting the council’s ‘block vote’ system:
There were 265 of those papers… that meant that each candidate of the Conservative party would be given 265 votes each. Instead of that someone multiplied the 265 votes by the ten candidates giving them 2650 votes each from the block voting.
Everybody is up in arms, we are a concerned little town. We feel that we have been badly treated and we know that the only way we can deal with this is to go to the High Court.
We believe in democracy and we want this sorted out.
Featured image via YouTube – RT UK
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?