Diplomatic leak inquiry has found no evidence of hacking, says minister

Support us and go ad-free

The inquiry into the leak of diplomatic cables criticising Donald Trump’s White House is focusing on whether “someone within the system” was responsible, a Foreign Office minister has said.

Sir Alan Duncan said there was no evidence the dispatches from Sir Kim Darroch – Britain’s ambassador to the US – had been obtained through computer hacking.

Instead, he said the investigation was looking at the possibility they had been “illicitly” released by someone with access to diplomatic reports.

Sir Kim announced on Wednesday he was standing down from his posting in Washington, saying his position had become “impossible” following a barrage of abuse from President Trump.

Trump
Sir Kim Darroch said his position had become ‘impossible’ (Niall Carson/PA)

Downing Street has said “initial discussions” have taken place with the police who could become formally involved in the leak inquiry if there was evidence of “criminal activity”.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

In the Commons, Sir Alan told MPs: “We do not, at the moment, have any evidence that this was a hack so our focus is on finding someone within the system who has released illicitly these communications… that is where the inquiry is primarily focused at the moment.”

There was continuing anger among many MPs at the role played by Boris Johnson, whose repeated refusal to back Sir Kim in Tuesday’s Tory leadership debate was widely seen to have contributed to his decision to quit.

The frontrunner to succeed Theresa May insisted it was nothing to do with him, saying he was “very surprised” at the construction which had been placed on events.

“I can’t believe they’re trying to blame me for this,” he told The Sun.

Trump
Boris Johnson has dismissed claims he was responsible for Sir Kim’s resignation (Henry Nicholls/PA)

“It seems bizarre to me. I’m a great supporter of Kim’s. I worked very well with him for years. I think that he’s done a superb job.”

Meanwhile, Downing Street has refused to be drawn on whether Mrs May intends to appoint a new ambassador before she leaves office in two weeks’ time.

Allies of Mr Johnson have insisted that it must be for the next prime minister to decide who Britain’s new envoy to the US should be.

However in response to questions, Mrs May’s official spokesman said only: “In terms of this particular replacement, that will take place in due course.”

Support us and go ad-free

Do your bit for independent journalism

Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.

We need you to help out, if you can.

When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.

You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.

In return you get:

  • Advert free reading experience
  • Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
  • 20% discount from our shop

 

The Canary Fund us