Jewish Voice for Labour accuses the BBC of showing ‘half-truths, distortions and outright invention’

Jeremy Corbyn and Panorama logo

On 10 July, the BBC‘s Panorama broadcast an hour-long show called Is Labour Antisemitic? The BBC claimed it presented “exclusive interviews from key insiders and access to confidential communications” in order to reveal “evasions and contradictions at the heart” of the Labour Party. Jewish Voice for Labour (JVL) has since responded with a statement calling the episode a “farrago of half-truths, distortions and outright invention”.

“The BBC has reached a new low”

JVL is a network for Jewish Labour members. It said that the BBC “reached a new low point” in broadcasting this episode. 

The group raised concerns that the BBC “entrusted a programme of great sensitivity” to John Ware. It argued that Ware is “a muck-raking journalist whose prejudices are well known”.

JVL also criticised the “principle ‘witnesses’ offered by the programme”. It said those interviewed:

were Labour Party ex-officials, appointed under Blair and deeply hostile to the members’ choice for Leader, Jeremy Corbyn. During the first years of Corbyn’s leadership it was officials working for the then General Secretary Iain McNicol who sabotaged the disciplinary process – not to protect antisemites, but so that Corbyn could be blamed for it. As described by Jewish NEC member Jon Lansman, on resigning they stole and then deleted whole tranches of correspondence – so that once again the Party could be blamed for not processing allegations effectively.

JVL also quoted a Labour Party statement that said:

These disaffected former officials include those who have always opposed Jeremy Corbyn’s leadership, worked to actively undermine it, and have both personal and political axes to grind.

Read on...

“Unforgivably careless with its facts”

JVL then raised concerns about the “selective choice of additional witnesses” in Is Labour Antisemitic?. It noted:

A small number of (unnamed) Jewish Labour party members made personal statements to camera of their discomfort at their sense of being in a hostile environment.

Yet JVL says there are “hundreds of statements from Jewish members entirely comfortable within the Party” that Panorama failed to interview. It continued:

A whole constituency party, Liverpool Riverside, was grotesquely maligned as antisemitic and bullying, but not one member of the CLP, Jewish or otherwise, was invited to respond. 

JVL claims that Panorama “was unforgivably careless with its facts”. For example, JVL said Panorama pointed to people like Jackie Walker as antisemitic despite “no charge of antisemitism” being upheld against her. JVL also says the programme failed to mention that Walker is Jewish. It continued:

The only supposed ‘crime’ of hers referred to – pointing out the Jewish role in the slave trade – was falsely represented without noting that she had been acquitted of the charge.

“Competitors in bias”

According to JVL, “the campaign of allegations” about antisemitism in Labour also “applies to the whole UK mainstream media”. It pointed to research by the Media Reform Coalition on the matter. It noted that this research found that “the BBC and Guardian out-did all their competitors in bias”.

“Any allegation of antisemitism,” JVL said, “must be taken seriously – and proven cases must be dealt with appropriately.” However, it also argued that “many of the alleged instances of antisemitism are not what they seem”. It said:

Many are quite evidently statements that members have made about the Israeli state or Zionism, twisted athletically to assert that their criticism is directed at and insulting to Jews. Many are the result of bulk allegations generated on an industrial scale by just a few organisations, prominent among them the Campaign Against Antisemitism, and Labour Against Antisemitism, set up explicitly to undermine the Corbyn leadership and to protect Israel.

JVL also noted that Panorama failed to mention the staff expansion by Labour’s current general secretary Jennie Formby. Those staff are now “struggling to catch up with the backlog” of additional accusations from these organisations, it said. 

“A grossly simplified and utterly distorted picture”

JVL accused the BBC of presenting “a grossly simplified and utterly distorted picture” of Labour’s efforts to deal with antisemitism allegations. It concluded:

It is shameful that the BBC has joined in an orchestrated campaign whose principal aim is quite clearly to prevent Jeremy Corbyn becoming Prime Minister of a Labour government committed to socialism. 

The BBC has defended the programme. In a statement to The Canary, a spokesperson said:

The BBC stands by its journalism and we completely reject any accusations of bias or dishonesty.

Last night’s Panorama explored a topic of undoubted public interest, broadcasting powerful and disturbing testimonies from party members who’d suffered anti-Semitic abuse. We also heard from former Labour officials, some of whom defied non-disclosure agreements to speak out about their experiences inside the Party and its anti-Semitism crisis. This shows the serious questions facing the party and its leadership on this issue.

The programme adhered to the BBC’s editorial guidelines, including a full right of reply for the Labour Party.

John Ware is a highly experienced and respected investigative journalist, whose track record includes critically-acclaimed and award-winning reports.

We reject any claims Panorama took any of the evidence out of context.

Featured images via Fréa Lockley and screengrab/BBCPanorama

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. In the interests of BBC impartiality and in view of the trouble they have gone to, to air the programme about Labour which has 0.06% anti Semitism which it acknowledges and is dealing with, I am looking forward to the programme about the party actually in government which has an incidence of 50% + Islamophobia which it denies, and an overt racist as favourite to be next PM. “Is the Tory party Islamophobic”. Until that appears (soon) their claims of impartiality are worth as much as the paper they waste to claim them.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.