Next BBC chief must revamp funding model to survive – George Osborne

The next director general of the BBC will have to come up with a new way of funding its work if the organisation is to survive the next 20 years, George Osborne has predicted.
The publicly-funded broadcaster is looking to appoint a replacement after current director general Tony Hall announced he would be standing down in the summer after seven years in the job.
London Evening Standard editor Osborne told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme that with competitors such as subscription-model pioneers Netflix eating into the market, the next chief at Broadcasting House would need to review the future of the licence fee.
The ex-chancellor warned “relying on a way the BBC was funded 50 years ago is not going to work in the next 20 years”, now there is such widespread competition.


Currently, those with a colour TV have to pay a £154.50 annual licence fee to fund the BBC’s output. Those who refuse to stump up the cash can face prosecution.
Read on...
In a bid to enter the streaming wars, the BBC joined fellow broadcasters ITV, Channel 4 and Channel 5 in setting-up BritBox last year, a £5.99 per month streaming service designed to rival Netflix and Amazon Prime. It offers popular series such as Downton Abbey, Gavin & Stacey, Wolf Hall and Broadchurch.
Osborne dealt closely with the BBC when he was chancellor, striking a finance deal in 2015 that saw the media outlet take responsibility for covering the cost of providing free television licences for over-75s.
Asked whether he is considering putting his name into the hat to replace Hall, Osborne said he is “very happy” in his current role.


He said: “I’ve negotiated with two director generals on licence fee settlements and I know what an interesting job it is.
“I’m very happy doing what I’m doing but whoever the new director general is has got to think really hard about the future funding of the BBC, because in a world of Netflix and Amazon and the like, relying on a way the BBC was funded 50 years ago is not going to work in the next 20 years.
“It requires quite a lot of forward and creative thinking to work out how a great British institution like the BBC thrives and flourishes in the future.”
The BBC board now has the responsibility of appointing a new director general, a post which, as of April 2019, comes with a £450,000 a year salary.
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
-
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.
BBC the British Tory mouth piece yet we the peasants pay its wages how can we allow such a outrage has this
My free license runs out in May. I’ve been told I’ll have buy another but I won’t. I will disconnect my TV from the airal & refuse to pay for another. I stopped looking at bbc drivel years ago will not pay now. My news sources are on the internet and the TV is now on only when I watch a dvd. The bbc is a rip-off and only mugs pay for it but I’m not going to join them.
The only reason I pay my TV license is because it’s the only way I know to keep their wolves from my door. I don’t need the stress. If there was a way to dodge the fee I’d do it.
I remember when Blair was PM he claimed for his TV license, saying that as a politician he needed to keep up with the news. How’s that for grasping? If he claimed the cost back I’m sure most MPs do it too.