Calls for clarity on how tougher rules on movement will be policed

Support us and go ad-free

A “huge amount of clarification” is needed on tougher rules to restrict people’s movements during the coronavirus crisis, a former police chief has said.

Prime minister Boris Johnson said the lockdown will be enforced by police, threatening those who flouted the rules with fines.

Officers will have powers to disperse gatherings after a ban on meetings of more than two people apart from those who live together was announced.

But questions remain as to how officers will monitor whether people are breaking the rules, what action will then be taken, and how much the fines will be.

Peter Fahy, former chief constable of Greater Manchester Police, told BBC Breakfast “there is a huge amount of clarification needed”.

(PA Graphics)
(PA Graphics)

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Police chiefs warned of phone lines being inundated with calls after Johnson’s statement, with questions about what movements are still permitted.

Northamptonshire Police chief constable Nick Adderley urged the public not to “cripple our phone” lines with inquiries on the PM’s announcement.

Lincolnshire Police warned of an “extremely high volume” of calls, and Humberside chief constable Lee Freeman said his force had received “a number of calls” on the subject, but he said he was unable to answer the questions asked.

Fahy said: “There is no way, really, that the police can enforce this using powers; it has got to be because the public hugely support it, that there is peer pressure and there is continuing clarification from government about the message and going through all the individual scenarios and questions that people will have about what happens in this situation.

“It feels like, in the next few days, we will need an implementation period, but the key thing is that the public accept that this is absolutely vital if lives are to be saved.”

He warned that police forces were “already very stretched” and questions would arise about whether officers have powers of arrest if they are tasked with dispersing groups of people, adding: “So, really, there is no way that this can be achieved through enforcement alone.

“It will have to be that the public hugely accept it and the government continues to issue clarification and reinforces the message.

“We don’t really want 43 separate police forces in England and Wales interpreting this in different ways and individual officers being faced with real dilemmas about whether to allow this or not to allow it.”

Asked how social distancing rules would be enforced by police, Martin Hewitt, chairman of the National Police Chiefs’ Council, told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, that, while laws are still being put in place, this is an “opportunity” for police to speak to people to urge them to go back home but added:  “Ultimately, if people do refuse to abide by the rules then we will need to enforce them.”

Manchester shootings
Peter Fahy is the former chief constable of Greater Manchester Police (Martin Rickett/PA)

However, he said the legislation has not been enacted yet.

Asked whether it was the police’s role to be at railway stations to check if people should be getting on to trains, he said: “I don’t think we’re at that stage at the moment.

“I think the real point about that is really getting the clarity, I know some other people have said that this morning.

“These are new rules, they are trying to be as clear as they can, but it will take a while, I think, for everybody to get that understanding.”

Ken Marsh, chair of the Metropolitan Police Federation, which represents officers in London, told Sky News the new measures will be a “real challenge” and “very difficult”.

He added: “We will be dealing with it, but I’m not sure we will have the resources to be able to see it through.”

John Apter, national chair of the Police Federation of England and Wales, had previously told the PA news agency he “cannot imagine” how officers would police social distancing, adding: “I just cannot rationally think how that would work.”

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us