British Airways’ treatment of staff a national disgrace, say MPs

The Canary

British Airways’ treatment of its workforce during the coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic “is a national disgrace”, MPs have claimed.

“Calculated”

A report by the Commons Transport Select Committee accused the airline of a “calculated attempt to take advantage” of the crisis by cutting up to 12,000 jobs and downgrading the terms and conditions of the bulk of its remaining employees.

The carrier insisted no decisions have been made and it’s doing everything it can to “sustain the maximum number of jobs”.

Other aviation companies have also announced thousands of redundancies, including easyJet, Ryanair, Virgin Atlantic, Rolls-Royce, and Airbus.

The cross-party committee of MPs acknowledged that job losses in the sector “may sadly be inevitable” due to the huge reduction in air travel as a result of coronavirus. But it urged UK-based employers not to “proceed hastily” by making large numbers of people redundant while the government’s furlough scheme is in place.

Unions told the committee they are opposed to what they described as a “fire and rehire” approach being considered by British Airways. They stated the airline is proposing to give redundancy notices to most of its 42,000 workers and offer jobs with new terms and conditions to a proportion of them, if it cannot reach an agreement on job cuts and other changes. The minimum 45-day consultation period for some workers ends on Monday.

BA has had discussions with pilots’ union Balpa, including over the possibility of voluntary redundancies. But the other two main unions representing its workers – Unite and GMB – are not engaging in talks.

“Wanton destruction”

The committee found that British Airways had received nearly £35m from the government as of May 14 by furloughing 22,000 staff.

Willie Walsh, chief executive of British Airways’ parent company IAG, told the MPs that the amount of money the airline received from the scheme in April was equivalent to less than two days of staff wages.

Unions have argued that the airline could survive even if all its planes were grounded for 12 months. The committee’s report stated:

The behaviour of British Airways and its parent company towards its employees is a national disgrace.

It falls well below the standards we would expect from any employer, especially in light of the scale of taxpayer subsidy, at this time of national crisis.

There have been calls from some MPs for British Airways to be stripped of some of its lucrative take-off and landing slots at Heathrow as punishment for the treatment of its workforce. Tory MP Huw Merriman, who chairs the committee, said:

We will continue to bring pressure where we can, including the airport slot allocation process.

This wanton destruction of a loyal workforce cannot appear to go without sanction by Government, parliamentarians or paying passengers who may choose differently in future. We view it as a national disgrace.

BA and Unite respond

British Airways said in a statement:

Mr Merriman made clear several weeks ago that the Transport Select Committee’s report would be ‘fuelled by the kind and impassioned messages’ he received, rather than the facts.

The facts are clear. The Government has no plans to help the sector restart and recover as evidenced by the introduction of the 14-day quarantine regulation.

We find ourselves in the deepest crisis ever faced by the airline industry. A crisis not of our making but one which we must address.

We will do everything in our power to ensure that British Airways can survive and sustain the maximum number of jobs consistent with the new reality of a changed airline industry in a severely weakened global economy.

Unite general secretary Len McCluskey said:

The case the company makes for sacking 12,000 and trashing the wages of those who stay on the workforce is full of holes because it is a transparent effort to generate profits out of a crisis.

BA is fooling nobody. Never before has the country witnessed such wholesale mistreatment of a UK workforce and such brutal industrial thuggery.

Quarantine questioned

The committee’s report into the impact of the pandemic on the aviation sector also urged the government to abandon its 14-day quarantine rule at the end of June.

A government spokesman said:

We continue to work at speed to help protect the long-term future of the sector, however we will always put public health first, and we must not risk an extremely damaging second wave of the virus.

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. How does a privatised company still manage to wear the British flag and is labelled ‘British Airways’? We know this national airline carrying status comes from when the airline was a nationalised asset until Tory prime minister of the time Margaret Thatcher had it privatised along with her mania to have all-and-sundry privatised. Shouldn’t Labour campaign to have the airline renationalised or have the company stripped of its Union Jack and ‘British Airways’ logo privilege?

    2. Let them go bust and we get cleaner skies & better air to breathe. The problem is they donate millions to the corrupt Tory gov. UKania has, & Killer Johnson & his clowns won’t to anything to stop that………….but CV19 is here to stay so maybe flying is a thing of the past. Easing house arrest just means a 2nd wave of infections & another 75.000 deaths so perhaps the writing is on the wall for them. The we have to support the unemployed……………………..

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.