British Airways’ treatment of staff a national disgrace, say MPs

British Airways’ treatment of its workforce during the coronavirus (Covid-19) pandemic “is a national disgrace”, MPs have claimed.


A report by the Commons Transport Select Committee accused the airline of a “calculated attempt to take advantage” of the crisis by cutting up to 12,000 jobs and downgrading the terms and conditions of the bulk of its remaining employees.

The carrier insisted no decisions have been made and it’s doing everything it can to “sustain the maximum number of jobs”.

Other aviation companies have also announced thousands of redundancies, including easyJet, Ryanair, Virgin Atlantic, Rolls-Royce, and Airbus.

The cross-party committee of MPs acknowledged that job losses in the sector “may sadly be inevitable” due to the huge reduction in air travel as a result of coronavirus. But it urged UK-based employers not to “proceed hastily” by making large numbers of people redundant while the government’s furlough scheme is in place.

Unions told the committee they are opposed to what they described as a “fire and rehire” approach being considered by British Airways. They stated the airline is proposing to give redundancy notices to most of its 42,000 workers and offer jobs with new terms and conditions to a proportion of them, if it cannot reach an agreement on job cuts and other changes. The minimum 45-day consultation period for some workers ends on Monday.

Read on...

BA has had discussions with pilots’ union Balpa, including over the possibility of voluntary redundancies. But the other two main unions representing its workers – Unite and GMB – are not engaging in talks.

“Wanton destruction”

The committee found that British Airways had received nearly £35m from the government as of May 14 by furloughing 22,000 staff.

Willie Walsh, chief executive of British Airways’ parent company IAG, told the MPs that the amount of money the airline received from the scheme in April was equivalent to less than two days of staff wages.

Unions have argued that the airline could survive even if all its planes were grounded for 12 months. The committee’s report stated:

The behaviour of British Airways and its parent company towards its employees is a national disgrace.

It falls well below the standards we would expect from any employer, especially in light of the scale of taxpayer subsidy, at this time of national crisis.

There have been calls from some MPs for British Airways to be stripped of some of its lucrative take-off and landing slots at Heathrow as punishment for the treatment of its workforce. Tory MP Huw Merriman, who chairs the committee, said:

We will continue to bring pressure where we can, including the airport slot allocation process.

This wanton destruction of a loyal workforce cannot appear to go without sanction by Government, parliamentarians or paying passengers who may choose differently in future. We view it as a national disgrace.

BA and Unite respond

British Airways said in a statement:

Mr Merriman made clear several weeks ago that the Transport Select Committee’s report would be ‘fuelled by the kind and impassioned messages’ he received, rather than the facts.

The facts are clear. The Government has no plans to help the sector restart and recover as evidenced by the introduction of the 14-day quarantine regulation.

We find ourselves in the deepest crisis ever faced by the airline industry. A crisis not of our making but one which we must address.

We will do everything in our power to ensure that British Airways can survive and sustain the maximum number of jobs consistent with the new reality of a changed airline industry in a severely weakened global economy.

Unite general secretary Len McCluskey said:

The case the company makes for sacking 12,000 and trashing the wages of those who stay on the workforce is full of holes because it is a transparent effort to generate profits out of a crisis.

BA is fooling nobody. Never before has the country witnessed such wholesale mistreatment of a UK workforce and such brutal industrial thuggery.

Quarantine questioned

The committee’s report into the impact of the pandemic on the aviation sector also urged the government to abandon its 14-day quarantine rule at the end of June.

A government spokesman said:

We continue to work at speed to help protect the long-term future of the sector, however we will always put public health first, and we must not risk an extremely damaging second wave of the virus.

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. How does a privatised company still manage to wear the British flag and is labelled ‘British Airways’? We know this national airline carrying status comes from when the airline was a nationalised asset until Tory prime minister of the time Margaret Thatcher had it privatised along with her mania to have all-and-sundry privatised. Shouldn’t Labour campaign to have the airline renationalised or have the company stripped of its Union Jack and ‘British Airways’ logo privilege?

    2. Let them go bust and we get cleaner skies & better air to breathe. The problem is they donate millions to the corrupt Tory gov. UKania has, & Killer Johnson & his clowns won’t to anything to stop that………….but CV19 is here to stay so maybe flying is a thing of the past. Easing house arrest just means a 2nd wave of infections & another 75.000 deaths so perhaps the writing is on the wall for them. The we have to support the unemployed……………………..

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.