MPs vote to remove child refugee protections from immigration law
The government has stripped out protections for lone child refugees from immigration legislation that will end EU freedom-of-movement rules in the UK.
Unaccompanied children
MPs voted 327 votes to 264 – majority 63 – to remove an amendment made by peers which would have required the government to ensure unaccompanied children in the EU continue to be relocated with close relatives in the UK. The division list showed six Conservative MPs rebelled to try and keep the measure in the Bill, including former ministers David Davis and Tim Loughton.
The amendment to continue existing arrangements had been successfully moved in the House of Lords by refugee campaigner and Labour peer lord Alf Dubs, who fled the Nazis as a child on the Kindertransport.
The Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill is part of the move towards the government’s new points-based immigration system, to be introduced from 2021.
Leave to remain
MPs also disagreed with Lords amendment three, to give EU children in care and care leavers automatic and indefinite leave to remain, by 330 votes to 262 – majority 68. Speaking during the debate, Conservative former cabinet minister Karen Bradley said it is “absolutely vital” to have safe and legal passages to the UK post-Brexit.
Read on...
She said:
If we want to stop the small boats, if we want to stop the migrants being under the wheel arches of vehicles, if we want to deal with this, we need to deal with it by making sure there is a safe and legal passage.
If I can quote Archbishop Desmond Tutu, who said, ‘There comes a point where we need to stop just pulling people out of the river, we need to go upstream and find out why they’re falling in’.
If I can urge the minister to work with the Home Office and newly created Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office to make sure upstream we’re dealing in source countries with how we stop people falling into the river, because we can’t deal with that problem just in the Channel.
Vulnerable children
Tory rebel and former minister Loughton added:
We need a Dubs 2 and we need a family reunion scheme regardless of Brexit.
We need it, we have a great tradition of saving these children, if we don’t have it in this Bill come January 1 we will have no safe and legal route for very, very vulnerable children.
Home Office minister Kevin Foster earlier said it “does not make sense” to have separate provisions for child refugees in EU member states compared with those in the rest of the world.
Freedom of movement
MPs also rejected Lords amendments to assess the end of freedom of movement on the social care sector, to give EU citizens granted permission to live in the UK physical evidence of their migration status, and to impose a 28-day limit on immigration detention for European Economic Area and Swiss nationals.
Liberal Democrat former minister Alistair Carmichael said in a statement:
The Windrush Scandal showed the devastating impact of the hostile environment on people who cannot easily prove their rights.
By denying EU citizens physical proof of settled status, the Government risks making them the victims of a new Windrush-style scandal.
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
-
Show Comments
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to leave a comment.Join the conversationPlease read our comment moderation policy here.
Such a proud Brexit nation! Positively Empirical!
What’s the name of that annual tv extravaganza charity vacuum that purports to deal with children in distress? Just another sticking plaster I suppose. The Tories have an 85 majority but only six voted to retain the amendment, which should of given a 79 majority rather than 63. No safety for children here, no freedom of movement here and, apparently, no secret peidophile ring among Britains political, legal and military elite. However, if one believes the 2019 election result the tories do represent the moral and political opinions of 47% of the voters in that election. What a sorry nation.