MPs vote to remove child refugee protections from immigration law

Home Office logo

The government has stripped out protections for lone child refugees from immigration legislation that will end EU freedom-of-movement rules in the UK.

Unaccompanied children

MPs voted 327 votes to 264 – majority 63 – to remove an amendment made by peers which would have required the government to ensure unaccompanied children in the EU continue to be relocated with close relatives in the UK. The division list showed six Conservative MPs rebelled to try and keep the measure in the Bill, including former ministers David Davis and Tim Loughton.

The amendment to continue existing arrangements had been successfully moved in the House of Lords by refugee campaigner and Labour peer lord Alf Dubs, who fled the Nazis as a child on the Kindertransport.

The Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill is part of the move towards the government’s new points-based immigration system, to be introduced from 2021.

Northern Ireland power sharing
Conservative MP Karen Bradley (Niall Carson/PA)

Leave to remain

MPs also disagreed with Lords amendment three, to give EU children in care and care leavers automatic and indefinite leave to remain, by 330 votes to 262 – majority 68. Speaking during the debate, Conservative former cabinet minister Karen Bradley said it is “absolutely vital” to have safe and legal passages to the UK post-Brexit.

Read on...

She said:

If we want to stop the small boats, if we want to stop the migrants being under the wheel arches of vehicles, if we want to deal with this, we need to deal with it by making sure there is a safe and legal passage.

If I can quote Archbishop Desmond Tutu, who said, ‘There comes a point where we need to stop just pulling people out of the river, we need to go upstream and find out why they’re falling in’.

If I can urge the minister to work with the Home Office and newly created Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office to make sure upstream we’re dealing in source countries with how we stop people falling into the river, because we can’t deal with that problem just in the Channel.

Vulnerable children

Tory rebel and former minister Loughton added:

We need a Dubs 2 and we need a family reunion scheme regardless of Brexit.

We need it, we have a great tradition of saving these children, if we don’t have it in this Bill come January 1 we will have no safe and legal route for very, very vulnerable children.

MP portraits
Home Office minister Kevin Foster (Chris McAndrew/UK Parliament)

Home Office minister Kevin Foster earlier said it “does not make sense” to have separate provisions for child refugees in EU member states compared with those in the rest of the world.

Freedom of movement

MPs also rejected Lords amendments to assess the end of freedom of movement on the social care sector, to give EU citizens granted permission to live in the UK physical evidence of their migration status, and to impose a 28-day limit on immigration detention for European Economic Area and Swiss nationals.

Liberal Democrat former minister Alistair Carmichael said in a statement:

The Windrush Scandal showed the devastating impact of the hostile environment on people who cannot easily prove their rights.

By denying EU citizens physical proof of settled status, the Government risks making them the victims of a new Windrush-style scandal.

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. What’s the name of that annual tv extravaganza charity vacuum that purports to deal with children in distress? Just another sticking plaster I suppose. The Tories have an 85 majority but only six voted to retain the amendment, which should of given a 79 majority rather than 63. No safety for children here, no freedom of movement here and, apparently, no secret peidophile ring among Britains political, legal and military elite. However, if one believes the 2019 election result the tories do represent the moral and political opinions of 47% of the voters in that election. What a sorry nation.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.