Labour is demanding the publication of the full inquiry findings into allegations of bullying by Priti Patel amid reports she was found to have broken the rules for ministers.
Boris Johnson has rejected calls to sack the home secretary after delivering his long-awaited verdict on her conduct on Friday, even though she breached the ministerial code. According to reports, she was found to have failed to meet the requirement to treat civil servants with respect and consideration.
Normally ministers are expected to resign if they breach the code, but a government statement said the PM is:
reassured that the home secretary is sorry for inadvertently upsetting those with whom she was working.
He is also reassured that relationships, practices and culture in the Home Office are much improved
Labour, meanwhile, has accused Johnson of presiding over a “cover-up” after it emerged that a fact-finding report into her behaviour will not be made public. Instead the PM released an assessment of its findings by his adviser on ministerial standards Alex Allan.
According to the Times, he concluded:
My advice is that the Home Secretary has not always met the high standards of the code in treating civil servants with respect.
Instances would meet the definition of bullying. To that extent her behaviour has been in breach of the ministerial code even if unintentional.
The paper said Allan was also critical of some civil servants in the Home Office saying they had not always been as “flexible” as they could have been in “responding to the Home Secretary’s requests and directions”. He was said to have found she “legitimately” felt that she had not always been supported by her department and that she received no feedback about the impact of her behaviour.
In light of Johnson’s announcement, Allan has resigned, saying:
I recognise that it is for the prime minister to make a judgement on whether actions by a minister amount to a breach of the ministerial code.
But I feel that it is right that I should now resign from my position as the prime minister’s independent adviser on the code.
— Labour Press (@labourpress) November 19, 2020
Shadow home secretary Nick Thomas-Symonds said Johnson appeared to be engaged in a cover-up and called for the immediate publication of the full Cabinet Office findings. He said:
These revelations could not be more serious. This has all the hallmarks of a cover-up from the Prime Minister and raises fundamental questions about his judgment.
His actions are all but condoning bullying in the workplace. In any other area of life this would not be acceptable. Yet again, it seems to be one rule for them and another for everyone else.
The report needs to be published in full immediately and both the Prime Minister and Home Secretary must come before Parliament to answer questions on this mess.”
Dave Penman, general secretary of senior civil servants’ union the FDA, said Johnson’s actions had undermined confidence in the whole process. He said:
In his foreword to the ministerial code, Boris Johnson said: ‘There must be no bullying and no harassment’.
If, as is being suggested, substance has been found in some of the allegations against the Home Secretary, then the Prime Minister should have no choice but to conclude that the code has been breached.
As Prime Minister, he is the sole arbiter of the ministerial code but he is also Minister for the Civil Service. Having pledged his support for the Home Secretary when the investigation began, and now sat on the report since the summer, he has already undermined confidence in this being a fair and impartial process.
Patel has called the claims “false”, and allies have described her as a “demanding” boss but not a bully. She has also claimed she was sorry “that my behaviour in the past has upset people”.
The Cabinet Office investigation was launched in March over allegations that Patel belittled colleagues and clashed with senior officials in three different departments. It followed the resignation of the Home Office’s permanent secretary Philip Rutnam who accused Patel of a “vicious and orchestrated briefing campaign” against him and is claiming constructive dismissal at an employment tribunal.
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?