• Donate
  • Login
Tuesday, June 16, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result
  • Editorial
  • Explainer
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Environment
  • Feature
  • Food
  • Health
  • Science
  • Skwawkbox
  • UK

Environmental groups unite to send a clear message to the government

James Aitchison by James Aitchison
13 November 2018
in UK
Reading Time: 4 mins read
168 5
A A
0
Home UK
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

Environmental groups have signed an open letter calling on the government to reject plans for a new gas power station due to be built in North Yorkshire. British energy company Drax revealed plans to convert two Shelby coal-powered plants into a gas plant. The plant would be the largest in the UK. The letter, addressed to business and energy secretary Greg Clark, calls on the government to refuse planning permission to Drax.

So far, 79 groups have signed the letter including various groups from the Friends of the Earth network, anti-fracking organisations, and the Green Party.

A blow to the Paris agreement

The government has announced that it will phase out the use of coal by 2025. However, the letter argues that the new gas plant will make a substantial contribution to greenhouse gas emissions. The groups insist that:

In order to meet the goal of the Paris Climate Agreement, it is vital for the UK to phase out carbon emissions from fossil fuels and high-carbon biomass, not increase them. Permitting power stations such as Drax to burn large quantities of natural gas will push us beyond the 1.5 degree limit and prevent the UK from meeting its international climate change commitments.

Even Drax has confirmed that the plant will make a significant contribution to global greenhouse gas emissions. The company’s preliminary environmental impact report states that there is “potential for long-term adverse effects due to the contribution of the Proposed Scheme to greenhouse gas emissions during operation”.

Increased reliance on fracking

According to the letter, construction of the plant would increase the need for further fracking in the UK and abroad:

A further concern is that Drax’s proposal comes at a time when greater reliance on gas would require either increased Russian imports or dependence on unconventional gas, especially fracking and horizontal drilling.

The government came under fire recently for revealing plans to make it easier for shale gas extraction companies to operate. This is despite large-scale public opposition to fracking in the UK. Opponents of fracking argue it not only risks contaminating water supplies, but it also contributes to climate change.

The public cost

Environmental costs aside, the letter also points out that the proposed plant will require large-scale government funding:

Finally, we are concerned that Drax has stated that the project will need substantial funding from tax payers, in the form of Capacity Market Payment subsidies over a 15 year period.

In response to the letter a Drax spokesperson issued the following statement:

Drax’s highly efficient gas re-power project will help deliver the government’s commitment to remove coal from the UK grid. This will help meet the country’s climate change obligations at the same time as keeping costs low for UK consumers.

The project will upgrade existing infrastructure, protecting jobs and reducing investment costs, and build one of what could be one of the world’s largest batteries, to provide capacity, stability and essential grid services.

Drax is already the largest decarbonisation project in Europe through its use of sustainable biomass. Gas generation will bring the flexibility needed to support the UK’s ongoing energy transition.

Clear benefits

According to the groups involved, denying Drax’s request to proceed with the gas plant plans would have a clear benefit:

This would reduce the UK’s carbon emissions, save biodiverse forests and protect communities from air pollution. It would also help the UK to meet its climate goals by creating a strong incentive to expand low-carbon renewable energy and investment in energy efficiency and conservation.

At the time of publication, the letter remains open to any organisations wishing to add their signatures. And it’s down to all of us to come together to oppose the plans.

Get Involved!

– Support The Canary if you appreciate the work we do.

– Follow the #AxeDrax campaign at Biofuelwatch

– Join your local anti-fracking group.

– Support Friends of the Earth

Featured image via Stara Blazkova/Wikipedia

Share128Tweet80ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

One tweet exposes the DWP for the monstrosity it is

Next Post

I start my superhero training tomorrow, and I’m absolutely bricking it

Next Post
Kerry-Anne Mendoza (L) and Ceri Lowe (R) in Nevada, US (2008)

I start my superhero training tomorrow, and I'm absolutely bricking it

A top barrister is calling out The Sun over yet another vile 'racist' attack

Fashion tips for cyclists [CARTOON]

Yawning men

Another unpopular politician advises Labour be more right-wing

Man with head in hands

Everyone should read this powerful thread on toxic masculinity

Ben Jamal
Skwawkbox

PSC’s Jamal demands apology from Board of Deputies

by Skwawkbox
16 June 2026
Somaliland and Israel
Analysis

Yemen at the heart of Israel’s push for a military foothold in Somaliland

by Joe Glenton
16 June 2026
Social media ban harms disabled children
Analysis

Campaigners warn Starmer’s social media ban will harm disabled kids

by Rachel Charlton-Dailey
16 June 2026
Composite image of Restore, Labour, Reform and Green candidates for Makerfield by-election in front of a Bee Network bus. Illustrating questions of candidates on public ownership
News

Only the Green Party commits to Makerfield public ownership pledges

by The Canary
16 June 2026
An image of a pack of hounds catching a hare at a fence line. In the foreground is Stowe School's logo and next to it is a european brown hare and the Canary logo
Analysis

Hunt activities at elite school exposed after illegal hare killing

by Antifabot
16 June 2026

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

Complaints and Corrections

About the Canary

Meet the Team

© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Ok

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart