Theresa May’s government could be facing two fresh legal challenges this summer

Theresa May and Royal Courts of Justice - fracking
Support us and go ad-free

A campaign group and a politician are bringing two separate legal challenges against the government over its fracking policy.

Fracking: a controversial industry

As Friends of the Earth describes, fracking is:

a process to extract oil or gas from shale rock. To get the gas and oil out, the rock has to be fractured – this is known as hydraulic fracturing or ‘fracking’ for short. A mixture of water, sand and chemicals is pumped down the well at very high pressure. This fractures the rock and when the pressure is released, the gas or oil flows back up the well.

The government says that fracking could give the UK “greater energy security, growth and jobs”. It claims it’s “encouraging” companies to explore fracking in a “safe and environmentally sound” way.

But the fracking industry is controversial. Campaigners are against it; not least because of its contribution to greenhouse gas emissions. It has also been linked to polluted drinking water and earthquakes. Studies have also shown links to low birth weights, premature births, and a possible increased risk of breast cancer.

Ignoring the evidence

Despite all this, on 24 July the government released its revised National Policy Planning Framework (NPPF) which includes updates on fracking. One particular section related to fracking states that authorities should:

recognise the benefits of on-shore oil and gas development, including unconventional hydrocarbons, for the security of energy supplies and supporting the transition to a low-carbon economy; and put in place policies to facilitate their exploration and extraction…

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

As DrillOrDrop reported, the guidance effectively relaxed the rules around fracking; something campaigners described as the government showing “contempt for people and our planet”.

So now, a campaign group and a mayor are both bringing separate legal actions against the government.

Legal challenge number one

The first is from Talk Fracking, a campaign group led by fashion designer Vivienne Westwood and her son Joe Corré. On 8 August, it issued the secretary of state for housing, communities and local government – James Brokenshire – with a pre-action legal letter. In a statement for The Canary, Talk Fracking claims that the NPPF guidance breaches the law; specifically, that it shows failures to:

  • Conduct a strategic environmental assessment.
  • Adhere to existing Climate Change Act 2008 obligations to reduce greenhouse emissions.
  • Consult on a fair basis.
  • Review three years of advanced scientific developments.

In a statement for The Canary, Corré said:

Fracking companies are in no way guaranteeing energy security from their activities – in fact the UK’s biggest fracker, INEOS, uses fracked gas imported from America to produced more and more disposable plastic. That’s the same plan for fracked gas from the UK.

[The government’s] statement has also been proven totally wrong in terms of its claims about fracking’s role in a low-carbon economy, a requirement in terms of our obligations to the Climate Change Act 2008.

Fracking is in fact worse than coal in terms of emissions.

The government has until 21 August to respond to Talk Fracking’s letter. If it doesn’t respond, or its response is inadequate, Talk Fracking will commence legal proceedings.

Legal challenge number two

Then, on 13 August, the mayor of North Yorkshire town Malton, Paul Andrews, announced his own legal bid against the government. It relates to a written statement made in May by secretary of state for business, energy and industrial strategy Greg Clark. The statement, effectively a preliminary policy announcement prior to July’s NPPF, instructs local authorities not to set:

restrictions or thresholds across their plan area that limit shale development without proper justification.

Again, as per the NPPF, Clark’s statement essentially gives the green light for more fracking. But Andrews has hit back, launching a crowdfunded judicial review of Clark’s and the government’s position. In a statement for The Canary, he said:

I am taking this legal action as a private individual as I consider it my duty to protect the interests of the communities I represent…

The statement seeks to impose an unacceptable level of government control on regional planning authorities… It will significantly reduce the ability of democratically elected local councils to establish their own parameters for fracking in their area…

[It] was issued unilaterally without public consultation at the whim of the government and its friends in the oil and gas industry, and has no democratic legitimacy whatsoever. It was also issued in such haste that Secretary of State failed to carry out a Strategic Environmental Assessment on the proposals, as required by law…

All rise?

A spokesperson for the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government told The Canary:

No one benefits from delays in planning decisions and we are committed to planning reforms to ensure quicker decision making on shale applications.

We will make sure the strongest environmental safeguards remain in place. Any proposed permitted development right would not apply to exploration in sensitive areas, including National Parks and Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty.

As The Canary has documented, there are ongoing protests in the UK against fracking. At one site in North Yorkshire, campaigners have been prosecuted. At another, campaigners and local councillors have accused police and private security at the site of “disproportionate force” and trying to “provoke violence” – something both groups deny. Police at one point “dragged” Green Party co-leader Jonathan Bartley away from the site.

But none of this has deterred the government. So it may now rest in the hands of the legal system to stop the burgeoning fracking industry. With these two court cases looming, it may be a long and politically hot summer for the government.

Get Involved!

Support Andrews’ crowdfunder and find out more about Talk Fracking.

Stay up to date with fracking news from DrillOrDrop.

Read more about fracking from The Canary.

Featured image via terencechisholm – Flickr and Estonian President – Flickr

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed