As swallows return to Norwich, the game may be up for the ‘sickening practice’ of netting

Photo of Harford Bridge Tesco, Norwich, and a swallow nest in its rafters

Swallows have returned to a nesting site at a Tesco in Norwich. And sand martins have returned to a cliff on the Norfolk coast. These victories came as the government set a date to discuss the ‘cruel practice’ of netting.

Swallows at Norwich

Swallows have returned to a Tesco in Norwich, Norfolk after the store removed netting from its rafters. The Harford Bridge supermarket received a huge amount of criticism after installing the material to stop swallows from nesting. The store said at the time that “health and safety concerns” over bird droppings on trolleys led to the move. Furthermore, it had cleared space at the back of the building for the birds. But experts pointed out that migratory birds including swallows will only nest in the exact same spot.

Tesco took the netting down on 16 March, describing it at the time as a ‘temporary’ measure. But on 28 April, the BBC reported that the store won’t put the nets back up. And, as a result, the first swallow nests have now been spotted in the rafters of the store. A local farmer and conservationist, Chris Skinner, credited social media for the victory.

However, it appears the wider Tesco network has been slower to reconsider netting. On 24 April, Stewart Abbot, who has helped lead the campaign against the practice, shared a photo he claimed showed a dead pigeon. He said the bird had become caught in netting at a Tesco store in Welling, London. And that came just a couple of weeks after a Tesco in Diss, Norfolk, said its netting was solely to “keep pigeons out of the roof”.

Sand martins at Bacton

Birds have also returned to nest in cliffs on the Norfolk coast.

North Norfolk District Council (NNDC) faced huge online backlash after Twitter user Bea posted a video on 8 April of a net stopping a sand martin from reaching its burrow. NNDC said that nearly a mile of netting had been put up for the safety of the birds during a large coastal engineering project. But experts again pointed out that the birds would return only to the same spot. As a result, the nets were in danger of wiping out a generation of sand martins.

The council quickly agreed to remove some of the nets and by 16 April had removed them from the upper section of the cliffs. Nets remained on the lower section because the council said burrows there would be “at risk of being blocked in”. Since then, Bea has posted photos and videos of sand martins nesting in the cliffs at Bacton:

Read on...


The issue exploded after people started sharing images of hedges and trees covered by netting. Although it has been “common practice” for several years, public awareness reached critical mass in February after photos of netted hedges in Winterton, Lincolnshire, went viral on social media. Subsequently, a petition to make netting illegal gained nearly 350,000 votes.

The government provided an initial response on 10 April. It said:

Developers must fulfil their obligation to safeguard local wildlife and habitats. Netting trees and hedgerows is only appropriate where genuinely needed to protect birds from harm during development.

And, because the petition crossed the 100,000 threshold, the government will debate it on 13 May.

While a parliamentary debate guarantees very little, it’s a testament to the strength of a small but committed campaign. And although it remains an issue across the country, the “sickening practice” of netting is now on the back foot.

Featured image via author

Get involved

  • Contribute to a map that pinpoints uses of anti-bird netting across the UK.
  • Sign a petition to give nesting sites the same legal protection as active nests.
  • Follow the #NetsDownForNature hastag on Twitter to stay updated on netting information.

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us