Legal changes treat rape survivors like criminals

Woman with face hidden holding out phone
Support us and go ad-free

Legal changes mean that police can demand victims of crime, including rape survivors, must now hand over their phones. Failure to do so could prevent prosecutions from going ahead. This new law has dangerous and worrying implications. Because it implies a sense of guilt for some survivors of violent crime.

Victim blaming

From 29 April, police in England and Wales will issue digital consent forms. These ask for “permission to access information including emails, messages and photographs”. As a result, people reporting violent crimes can be asked to hand over phones and other devices. Although these consent forms potentially support a range of criminal investigations, they’re particularly concerning for rape and sexual assault survivors.

People can refuse to give consent. But if they do so, the form states:

If you refuse permission for the police to investigate, or for the prosecution to disclose material which would enable the defendant to have a fair trial then it may not be possible for the investigation or prosecution to continue.

As Rachel Krys, co-director of the End Violence Against Women Coalition said, there’s already “an extremely serious problem with prosecuting rape in this country”. It “is a fact” she continued, “that most rapists get away with it”. As she explained, this is partly because:

investigations too often focus on women’s character, honesty and sexual history, despite rules which are supposed to prevent this, instead of the actions and behaviour of the person accused.

This new law places survivors of sexual violence in an even more vulnerable position. As Krys noted, digital consent forms present another “barrier to reporting rape”. And as Labour’s shadow policing & crime minister Louise Haigh stated, people’s “lives shouldn’t be on trial because they’ve been raped or assaulted’.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free
No defence

According to police and prosecutors, the forms “attempt to plug a gap in the law”. Those supporting the move claim that lack of disclosure led to the collapse of some rape trials. The Guardian reported that in 2018, rape charges fell 23%:

to [the] lowest level in a decade, following the collapse of a series of trials in late 2017 due to problems of disclosure.

But this defence ignores the damaging and intense personal scrutiny that many women already face during rape trials. And it fails to take into account the volume of sensitive and personal information most people have on their phones. The BBC reported:

Director of Public Prosecutions Max Hill said they would only be looked at where it forms a “reasonable line of enquiry”, with only relevant material going before a court if it meets stringent rules.

But Big Brother Watch (BBW) called the new laws “an abject failure to protect victims’ privacy rights from spurious investigations”. As a press release noted:

The policy requires victims of rape to agree to mass data downloads from their phones, or even a full copy of their phone data to be taken, even if only a single message or photo is relevant.

BBW believes digital consent forms may “breach human rights law”. And as BBW’s Griff Ferris said, no survivor of violent or sexual crime should ever “have to make a choice between privacy rights and justice”.

Survivors know the truth

According to Rape Crisis, a 2013 report established that approximately “85,000 women and 12,000 men are raped in England and Wales alone every year”. The 2017 Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW), estimated in the previous year:

  • 20% of women and 4% of men experienced some type of sexual assault since the age of 16. This is equivalent to 3.4 million female and 631,000 male victims.
  • 3.1% of women (510,000) and 0.8% of men (138,000)… had experienced a sexual assault in the last year.

In 2017-18, Rape Crisis recorded a 17% rise from the previous year in people accessing its services. It also reported that women accounted for 93% of its service users. But despite this, rape crisis centres have also warned about the impact of funding cuts since 2015.

As the I Believe Her campaign noted, many survivors of sexual violence already struggle to come forward or contact police because of:

the fear of not being believed, the guilt and shame that society makes survivors feel, and the trauma of the rape itself.

We need to end this culture of shame. To demand that those brave enough to report crimes should also sign digital consent forms is simply wrong. Until we live in a society where there is no sexual violence, we must stand with every woman who is brave enough to speak out against it.

Featured image via Justin Main on Unsplash

Support us and go ad-free

Get involved

  • Anyone affected by the issues raised in this story can seek free, confidential advice from Rape Crisis

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. Defense Lawyers will be demanding to see these anyway, the reason for these changes is that cases have collapsed through lack of disclosure. Many want convictions on the mere word of the alleged victim without so much as a trail, which would be a convenient way of eliminating political dissidents such as Julian Assange. Someone charged with rape faces a long prison sentence and they are therefor entitled to a trial
      Victims are always asked questions by investigating officers, eg after being stabbed a couple of years ago I was asked if the incident had anything to do with drugs. And if someone has made a false accusation, they are criminals.

      1. However horrific rape may be, the principle of innocent until proven guilty must still apply. Rape is notoriously difficult to prove, and the principles of justice must still apply. False allegations can be brought, and there is already a serious imbalance contained in the right to anonymity of the person allegedly offended against, as opposed to the complete lack of privacy for the alleged offender.

        Maybe the longer-term answer is to consider whether rape is a crime that can be dealt with effectively through the criminal justice system.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.