Genetic test can tell if your chest infection needs antibiotics
GPs may soon be able to test their patients’ genes to decide whether to prescribe antibiotics, tackling a key problem in the fight against antibiotic resistance. Such a test would give doctors the evidence they need to show patients with viral infections they don’t really need antibiotics – but it first needs to be developed for clinical use.
According to World Health Organization, antibiotic resistance is “one of the three greatest threats to human health.” An estimated 400,000 people a year are infected with a resistant strain of bacteria, and 25,000 of these patients die.
One of the main factors contributing to antibiotic resistance is the prescription of treatments for the wrong infections – antibiotics can only be used to treat infections caused by bacteria. Current tests look for the bacteria or viruses directly, but they are notorious for false positives and inconclusive results.
A team at Duke University decided to take a new angle on the problem and ask the body to identify what’s making it sick. Their research shows that looking at a patient’s genes can reveal whether their illness is being caused by bacteria or viruses. Lead researcher Ephraim Tsalik will present the findings in a workshop at the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on Friday.
When a patient has a bacterial or viral infection, their immune system launches an attack on the invaders. During such an immune response, certain genes are activated; tracking a patient’s genetic signature can reveal whether the infection is caused by bacteria or viruses.
During a six-year study, the team collected blood samples from more than 300 patients who had symptoms that would indicate a bacterial or viral infection. They analysed the samples to find out which genes were activated in the immune response, and compared the results with the diagnosis of each patient. The patterns they found in the way genes were expressed were different for bacterial and viral infections, with around 90% accuracy. This suggests the new approach could be used successfully to determine whether antibiotics should be prescribed.
[pull_quote_right author=””]…the new approach could be used successfully to determine whether antibiotics should be prescribed.[/pull_quote_right]
The biggest hurdle still remains: turning the approach into a diagnostic test that can be used by the doctors prescribing antibiotics. The FDA has set out questions that should be addressed in the development of a test that looks at a patient’s immune response, rather than the bacteria or viruses. These questions will be discussed in Friday’s workshop.
In the workshop’s discussion document, the FDA notes: “The use of non-microbial biomarkers as indicators of infection offers the promise of significantly improving antibiotic stewardship; however, clinical validation of these assays remains a significant challenge to test developers.” The workshop will bring together people from academia, government, industry and clinical laboratories to discuss how to take this promising research forward.
Feature image: “Sneeze” by James Gathany – CDC Public Health Image library ID 11162
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.