We already knew before the US elections that Donald Trump had the support of notorious white supremacists like the Ku Klux Klan. But since his victory, neo-Nazis clearly feel energised and hopeful that Trump will back their aims. And the President-elect’s failure to distance himself from them suggests that some of the things on their wish list may just come true.
Nazi salutes for Trump
On 18 November, a restaurant in Washington DC hosted a white nationalist event. Its sponsor was the National Policy Institute (NPI), a far-right group which supported Trump’s election campaign. At the dinner, participants allegedly praised Adolf Hitler.
Self-proclaimed Hitler fan Tila Tequila shared the following image of her doing a Nazi salute at the event:
The New York Times, meanwhile, reported on how NPI President and Director Richard B. Spencer – a leading ideologue of the ‘alt-right’ – had spoken at the group’s annual conference on 19 November. There, he quoted Nazi propaganda, said the US belonged to white people, and suggested that media outlets had criticised Trump’s election campaign to protect Jewish interests (saying “One wonders if these people are people at all”).
Just days before Spencer’s speech, Twitter suspended both his account and that of the NPI in a crackdown on “violent threats, harassment, hateful conduct, and multiple account abuse”.
Neo-Nazis with another name
Hail Trump, hail our people, hail victory!
The latter was a translation of the Nazis’ Sieg heil! salute. And if there was any doubt about the Nazi overtones at the conference, a number of audience members responded to Spencer’s words by making the Nazi salute with their arms.
Spencer told the conference he had coined the term ‘alt-right’, saying the movement’s focus was on reaffirming white identity.
In short, we could see the term ‘alt-right’ as a soft and roundabout way of saying white supremacist, far-right, or neo-Nazi. Heavy also describes how the movement has a focus on “masculinity” and an opposition to multiculturalism (and thus immigration). This Washington Post video sums up the ideology in greater detail:
The far-right and Trump’s campaign
Trump’s choice of Steve Bannon as campaign chairman and then chief strategist shows that the President-elect is very keen on keeping the far right on his side. Bannon previously ran Breitbart News – the most prominent ‘alt-right’ media platform. Many know Breitbart for its racist, sexist, and antisemitic headlines.
Anti-immigration website founder Peter Brimelow, however, insists that “Trump and Steve Bannon are not alt-right people”, but that they had simply seized on two big issues that the far-right movement cares about. The Trump campaign’s opposition to immigration and political correctness, he said, had helped to ensure Trump’s majority among all demographics in white America (bar college-educated women).
In short, Trump may differ in opinion with far-right groups on some issues, but he essentially co-opted them into his support base to ensure victory.
But Trump has at least distanced himself a bit from Nazi salutes, right?
When Vice President-elect Mike Pence went to see a play recently, the actors told him they were “alarmed and anxious” about their future under the Trump Administration. And President-elect Trump jumped to Pence’s defence, seeing him as a helpless victim. He quickly appealed on Twitter for an apology from the cast.
Finally, on 21 November, Trump responded. Indirectly.
A statement from Trump spokesman Bryan Lanza said Trump “has continued to denounce racism of any kind”. But the statement failed to condemn Spencer, the NPI, and other white supremacists who have been celebrating his coming presidency.
Trump’s America as a haven and inspiration for the far right
There needs to be some very straight talking in the wake of Trump’s victory. The US has already suffered a wave of hate crimes since 9 November. And day one in post-election America was indicative of the hateful and divisive atmosphere that the Republican’s electoral campaign had encouraged. Tip-toeing around the terminology helps no one. Some Trump supporters talk and act like Nazis, so we should call them Nazis. We owe that to the millions of people from Jewish and other minority communities that Hitler’s regime murdered.
At the same time, not all Trump supporters are neo-Nazis. True, it’s disgusting to think that voters could see his fascism, racism, and misogyny and still vote for him. But some people were desperate for change. And they sided with Trump over an opponent seen as a champion of the status quo, even when they’d backed Barack Obama and Bernie Sanders previously.
But nuance aside, the fact is that Trump’s victory has inspired far-right nationalists throughout the world. They’re energised. They’re celebrating. And they’re working to turn people’s economic and political desperation into ethnic hatred. That’s what the Nazis did. And that’s what neo-Nazis want to do today.
Which dream for the future will win?
In short, the fight is on for the hearts and minds of marginalised and disenchanted communities throughout the world. And there are two clear contenders: nationalism and progressive politics. One with its scapegoating of minorities and its politics of distraction. And the other with its focus on the true causes of injustice and inequality, and a commitment to hearing people’s voices and supporting their communities.
Will the dream of a divided world triumph? Or will the victor be Martin Luther King Jr’s dream of a united world, where people “will not be judged by the colour of their skin but by the content of their character”?
If we want the latter, then we need to stand up and be counted.
Featured image via YouTube
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?