Theresa May gets the chance to stand up to Trump on Jerusalem. She bottles it.

Support us and go ad-free

Theresa May had some harsh words for Donald Trump after he announced the US would recognise Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. MPs then gave the government an opportunity to act on those words during a debate on the decision in parliament.

But the government bottled it, proving it’s as flaccid as ever despite its tough rhetoric.

Jerusalem

The US President confirmed on 6 December that the US would recognise Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. He also announced that his country would relocate its embassy to the city. The decision received widespread criticism.

May said Trump’s choice was “unhelpful in terms of prospects for peace in the region”.

Israel presently has no officially recognised sovereignty over Jerusalem. But it seized western Jerusalem in the 1948 Arab-Israeli war. And it then occupied East Jerusalem during the 1967 war. Around 423,000 Palestinians live in Jerusalem. Nearly two thirds of them live in the areas seized by Israel in 1967.

Urgent question

Shadow Foreign Secretary Emily Thornberry raised an urgent question in parliament on the issue. She accused Trump of taking an “absolute hammer blow” to the peace process in making the decision. And she asked Foreign Office Minister Alistair Burt what the government is “going to do about this mess”.

Numerous MPs, however, posed a different question. They asked Burt when the government would recognise Palestine as a state. They clearly thought the response to Trump’s ‘reckless‘ decision should be to recognise Palestine immediately. But Burt didn’t agree. Parliamentary record Hansard recorded him as saying:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Our view has been that recognition of Palestine should come at the time when that is in the best interests of prospects for peace and the peace process. That remains our position for now.

Ridiculous answer

It is clear that many view Trump’s decision as a threat in itself to the peace process. Thornberry noted that, as did many MPs. Protests and unrest in Palestine and beyond are already happening because of it. So if the government is waiting until it is “in the best interests of prospects for peace and the peace process” to recognise Palestine, now is the time. But it said no.

Burt also said no to ruling out a state visit from Trump.

Essentially, the government is taking a ‘keep calm and carry on’ attitude to Trump’s catastrophic decision. It’s not willing to take any action that will make an actual difference. So its tough talk should be taken with a pinch of salt.

Get Involved!

Join the protest against Trump’s decision in London on 8 December.

Support the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement.

Take action with the Palestine Solidarity Campaign.

Featured image via The White House/Flickr

Support us and go ad-free

Do your bit for independent journalism

Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.

We need you to help out, if you can.

When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.

You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.

In return you get:

  • Advert free reading experience
  • Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
  • 20% discount from our shop

 

The Canary Fund us

Comments are closed