Jeremy Hunt really shouldn’t have waded into ‘smear Corbyn week’

Jeremy Hunt and Jeremy Corbyn
Support us and go ad-free

Correction: This article was changed at 12.45 on 19 August. It originally said the Moonies were well-documented for tax evasion. It now clarifies that the documentation refers to the group’s leader, who was convicted of tax evasion.

Foreign secretary Jeremy Hunt is the latest person to wade in and criticise Jeremy Corbyn. But he really shouldn’t have done this. Because it lifts the lid on Hunt’s very dubious past.

“Spare us your crap”

As the media smears against Corbyn roll on, Hunt decided to take a pop at the Labour leader on Twitter:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

But it didn’t take long for people to point out that Hunt’s track record in meeting extremists is far from exemplary.

The co-founder of Novara Media, for example, noted that – as president of the Oxford University Conservative Association (OUCA) – Hunt held a dinner for terrorist leader Adolfo Calero:

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) found in the 1980s that the US had violated international law in Nicaragua through its support for the anti-government ‘Contras’. Noam Chomsky explained in 1992 how this group had waged “a large-scale terrorist war” in Nicaragua on behalf of Washington. This war killed roughly 30,000 people.

“Invitations to terrorists”

And there is no doubt that this did happen. A report from Byline reveals that, as OUCA president, Hunt was:

criticized by a top Tory Ward chairman of a ‘cover-up’ regarding OUCA’s links to extreme right wing organisations.

As Byline reported, copies of the Oxford University paper Cherwell outline this exchange. In 1987, the OUCA hosted a dinner for Contra leader Calero. As Human Rights Watch reported:

the contras were major and systematic violators of the most basic standards of the laws of armed conflict, including by launching indiscriminate attacks on civilians, selectively murdering non-combatants, and mistreating prisoners.

Hunt was also criticised by Conservative MP Andrew Foulsham, who said:

We cannot stand up as the party of law and order whilst supporting such men and invitations to terrorists cannot be said to be furthering the aims and reputations of the Conservative Party.

So Hunt’s criticism of Corbyn ‘justifying terrorism’ seems hypocritical, at best.


But Hunt’s right-wing connections don’t end there:

During the 1980s, the so-called ‘Moonies’ pushed to gain more leverage in US politics. Its leader was convicted of tax evasion and it had a right-wing “conservative political agenda”. The Moonies also held a strong “anti-communist commitment”.

As Byline states, Hunt was also criticised when:

Cherwell reported how the Freedom Society an “extreme right wing organisation which has links to the Moonie cult” secured funding [thanks to “one of Hunt’s committee members”] from the University to host Dr Colin Tarfus, the UK Director of the Unification Church’s organisation CARP.

Peak hypocrisy

Hunt is now foreign secretary. So some also questioned his role with countries currently involved in horrific acts of violence:

This was an ill-judged comment by Hunt. With a past like his, he should have stayed well out of this.

In a ‘battle of the Jeremys’, it’s overwhelmingly clear who actually does have more “moral authority”. Corbyn always has continually worked for peace, and probably always will – something that will never be true of Hunt.

Get Involved!

– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.

– Read more of The Canary‘s reporting on Latin America. And also see more Global articles on Facebook and Twitter.

Featured images via Ted Eytan/Wikimedia and Rwendland/Wikimedia

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed