Jeremy Hunt really shouldn’t have waded into ‘smear Corbyn week’

Jeremy Hunt and Jeremy Corbyn
Support us and go ad-free

Correction: This article was changed at 12.45 on 19 August. It originally said the Moonies were well-documented for tax evasion. It now clarifies that the documentation refers to the group’s leader, who was convicted of tax evasion.

Foreign secretary Jeremy Hunt is the latest person to wade in and criticise Jeremy Corbyn. But he really shouldn’t have done this. Because it lifts the lid on Hunt’s very dubious past.

“Spare us your crap”

As the media smears against Corbyn roll on, Hunt decided to take a pop at the Labour leader on Twitter:

Read on...

But it didn’t take long for people to point out that Hunt’s track record in meeting extremists is far from exemplary.

The co-founder of Novara Media, for example, noted that – as president of the Oxford University Conservative Association (OUCA) – Hunt held a dinner for terrorist leader Adolfo Calero:

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) found in the 1980s that the US had violated international law in Nicaragua through its support for the anti-government ‘Contras’. Noam Chomsky explained in 1992 how this group had waged “a large-scale terrorist war” in Nicaragua on behalf of Washington. This war killed roughly 30,000 people.

“Invitations to terrorists”

And there is no doubt that this did happen. A report from Byline reveals that, as OUCA president, Hunt was:

criticized by a top Tory Ward chairman of a ‘cover-up’ regarding OUCA’s links to extreme right wing organisations.

As Byline reported, copies of the Oxford University paper Cherwell outline this exchange. In 1987, the OUCA hosted a dinner for Contra leader Calero. As Human Rights Watch reported:

the contras were major and systematic violators of the most basic standards of the laws of armed conflict, including by launching indiscriminate attacks on civilians, selectively murdering non-combatants, and mistreating prisoners.

Hunt was also criticised by Conservative MP Andrew Foulsham, who said:

We cannot stand up as the party of law and order whilst supporting such men and invitations to terrorists cannot be said to be furthering the aims and reputations of the Conservative Party.

So Hunt’s criticism of Corbyn ‘justifying terrorism’ seems hypocritical, at best.


But Hunt’s right-wing connections don’t end there:

During the 1980s, the so-called ‘Moonies’ pushed to gain more leverage in US politics. Its leader was convicted of tax evasion and it had a right-wing “conservative political agenda”. The Moonies also held a strong “anti-communist commitment”.

As Byline states, Hunt was also criticised when:

Cherwell reported how the Freedom Society an “extreme right wing organisation which has links to the Moonie cult” secured funding [thanks to “one of Hunt’s committee members”] from the University to host Dr Colin Tarfus, the UK Director of the Unification Church’s organisation CARP.

Peak hypocrisy

Hunt is now foreign secretary. So some also questioned his role with countries currently involved in horrific acts of violence:

This was an ill-judged comment by Hunt. With a past like his, he should have stayed well out of this.

In a ‘battle of the Jeremys’, it’s overwhelmingly clear who actually does have more “moral authority”. Corbyn always has continually worked for peace, and probably always will – something that will never be true of Hunt.

Get Involved!

– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.

– Read more of The Canary‘s reporting on Latin America. And also see more Global articles on Facebook and Twitter.

Featured images via Ted Eytan/Wikimedia and Rwendland/Wikimedia

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us

Comments are closed