It’s been an embarrassing week for the BBC, and it keeps getting worse. On 29 November, Evolve Politics reported that a “vicar” who had debated Brexit on Newsnight was also a “BBC actor”. And now, reports have emerged which suggest that the BBC has been colluding with the Tory government over the upcoming Brexit debate. The broadcasting company has surely proven itself totally unfit to host any Brexit debate.
On 26 November, Newsnight hosted a panel discussion on Brexit.
One of the panel members was a vicar named Lynn Hayter, who was an ardent supporter of both Brexit and Donald Trump. While Lynn is a “pastor“, she is also an actor who has previously appeared on other BBC shows.
Journalist Paul Mason argued that:
casting a pro-Trump weirdo in a dog collar who then uses her communication skills to put the government case is either an oversight or a poor editorial decision.
Three days after Newsnight’s controversial panel discussion, meanwhile, reports emerged suggesting that “Number 10 were in bilateral discussions with the BBC” regarding a proposed Brexit debate between Theresa May and Jeremy Corbyn:
Looks like Number 10 were in bilateral discussions with the BBC for weeks. Their leaked grid on the 6th November mentions an interview with Dimbleby, and they briefed into Monday’s Telegraph they’d have a “Question Time style session” if Corbyn refused a debate pic.twitter.com/veA3wAUxc4
— Matt Zarb-Cousin (@mattzarb) November 29, 2018
One report suggested that the “BBC may have been in discussions [with the Tory government] for a few weeks”. And another said: “Mrs May will hold a Question Time-style session with a television audience hosted by David Dimbleby”.
The prime minister may have therefore known about the BBC “invite” for longer than it suggested she had.
Novara Media co-founder Aaron Bastani wrote in response:
This is utterly appalling. Labour and Corbyn should go nowhere near the BBC until this is explained in full.
— Aaron Bastani (@AaronBastani) November 30, 2018
Impartial debate on the BBC?
Whatever channel hosts the Brexit debate, it’s crucial that it remains impartial.
Jeremy Corbyn has stated that he prefers a one-on-one debate with May. But if the BBC hosts the debate, this seems unlikely. Rather than a direct conversation, the two leaders would reportedly face questions from a mixed panel of members of the public, politicians, and public figures.
According to BuzzFeed News:
Ten members of the panel would have been in favour of the [May’s] deal, while the other ten would have… argued for alternatives ranging from a no-deal Brexit to single-market membership to a second referendum.
Half of the panel members would therefore agree with May’s Brexit plan – and the rest would be divided.
Owen Jones responded:
Absolutely amazing. The BBC are seriously pushing for a Corbyn vs May debate format which would include a panel, half of whose members backed the deal, the other half divided between other positions, like a 2nd referendum and No Deal.
Comically rigged in favour of the Tories. https://t.co/smr1TlC6RP
— Owen Jones🌹 (@OwenJones84) November 30, 2018
In the words of Australian journalist John Pilger:
around the BBC there’s this sort of cult that if you enter the BBC you immediately rise to a nirvana of impartiality and there are two sides to everything. That’s nonsense to begin with, but the BBC is an extension of the established order in this country.
Ultimately, it’s clear that the BBC is unfit to host any impartial debate on Brexit. Corbyn is right to avoid it.
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?