• Donate
  • Login
Thursday, June 4, 2026
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
Cart / £0.00

No products in the basket.

MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result
  • Editorial
  • Explainer
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Environment
  • Feature
  • Food
  • Health
  • Science
  • Skwawkbox
  • UK

People noticed something very odd about a BBC story on Venezuela’s latest ‘threat’

Tracy Keeling by Tracy Keeling
28 January 2019
in Global, Trending, UK
Reading Time: 3 mins read
162 10
A A
2
Home Global
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on BlueskyShare via WhatsAppShare via TelegramShare on Threads

BBC News ran a story titled US ‘will respond to Venezuelan threats’ on 28 January. But people noticed something rather odd after delving into the broadcaster’s article. Namely, that Venezuela has made no “threats”. In fact, the BBC only details threats made by the US to possible (and at this stage imagined) aggression from Venezuela.

So there’s no story here. Or, if there is, it should be titled ‘US threatens Venezuela’. But that would get in the way of the propaganda narrative that the BBC, and other British outlets, are spouting on this issue.

No threats

The BBC News story details Nicolás Maduro’s decision to expel US diplomats from Venezuela on 24 January. Maduro initiated the expulsion order in response to Washington’s involvement in the current coup attempt. But the country’s Foreign Ministry has now withdrawn the order.

So the BBC detailed Washington’s latest comments on that diplomatic stand-off. Its national security adviser, John Bolton, said any “intimidation” of US diplomats, or opposition leader Juan Guaidó, would meet with “a significant response”. Not that anyone would know that from the headline it originally ran with the story:

https://twitter.com/ShoebridgeC/status/1089792310789976064

The BBC appears to have subsequently changed the article’s headline to Venezuela crisis: White House ‘will respond to threats against diplomats’. On the ‘Global News Podcast’, however, the US ‘will respond to Venezuela threats’ title remained.

Not alone

But the BBC is not alone in reporting on the Venezuelan situation in a way that reinforces the UK government’s case for supporting the coup. The Guardian, for example, is also facing criticism for its less than objective coverage on the situation:

Extraordinary even by the Guardian's standards. Juan Guaido, the CIA's pick to lead a coup against Venezuela's govt, gives the paper one of his first interviews – and it simply acts as a conduit for his propaganda. It doesn't even pretend to be a watchdog https://t.co/GkmR5Dp3w6

— Jonathan Cook (@Jonathan_K_Cook) January 28, 2019

In the people’s interest

Thankfully, though, the BBC is keeping up at least a veneer of impartiality. It’s invited on some guests, such as journalist Pablo Navarrete, who’ve provided a momentary challenge to the pro-regime change output in the British media:

Earlier today I was interviewed on BBC World TV about the attempted coup in Venezuela. https://t.co/EeKcYduF30

— Pablo Navarrete #CeasefireNow (@pablonav1) January 26, 2019

Navarrete says the only solution to the current crisis in Venezuela is a political one, not “a military coup headed by the US”. And as The Canary previously reported, polling data shows that Venezuelan citizens overwhelmingly reject that sort of intervention.

Regardless, news coverage continues to blatantly boost the case for interference.

When it comes to war and imperialism, it seems the UK media never changes.

Featured image via BBC News/Wikimedia

Tags: BBCVenezuela
Share128Tweet80ShareSendShareShare
Previous Post

Analysis suggests Brexit Plan B is just Plan A in a different font

Next Post

12 days later, the BBC finally admits Fiona Bruce did make fun of Diane Abbott

Next Post
Diane Abbott and BBC logo

12 days later, the BBC finally admits Fiona Bruce did make fun of Diane Abbott

Andy Davies, a homeless person in Cardiff.

One man has moving words for the Tory councillor who wants to 'tear down' his tent

Grenfell Tower

Hundreds of buildings still at risk of another Grenfell scale tragedy

Integrity Initiative website message

A government-funded destabilisation network is forced to disable its own website

BBC studio and Pablo Navarrete

Watch a guest demolish the BBC’s Venezuela propaganda straight to the broadcaster’s face

Comments 2

  1. neil_hinton says:
    7 years ago

    *Dangerous precedents are being set in the Latin Americas. Consider the US/European policy of vi et armis with regards to Venezuela: I seem to remember six weeks of violent protest throughout the US after the presidential election of 2016, an election that the political class themselves claimed to have been invalidated by Russian interference. From this set of disconcertingly familiar circumstances, am I to assume that we, as Western Europeans, should have rejected the Trump presidency and officially acknowledged the leadership of Hilary Clinton instead? As previously stated, the Maduro administration is far from perfect, and is in fact at some level defined by corruption and economic ineptitude- but this does not deny the peoples of Venezuela the right to self-determination, a founding principle of Woodrow Wilson’s 14 Points proclamation from 1918. Historically, is their even one example of a positive outcome after US interference in the political architecture of a sovereign nation? I’m no historian, and I may be wrong, but I can’t think of any.

    Reply
  2. loon says:
    7 years ago

    Nicely done Tracy. George Orwell would of been pleased to the attention paid to the details of what was really said.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ben-Gvir
Global

Genocidal Ben-Gvir calls Lebanon ceasefire a ‘serious mistake’

by HG
4 June 2026
Genocide
Skwawkbox

Breaking: Swiss court shames UK by refusing to criminalise anti-genocide protest

by Skwawkbox
4 June 2026
Israel
Skwawkbox

Israel is still burning families in Gaza

by Skwawkbox
4 June 2026
The Simple Guide to Faster and More Secure Document Sharing
Tech

The Simple Guide to Faster and More Secure Document Sharing

by Nathan Spears
4 June 2026
Justice bill
Analysis

Stormont Justice Bill permits the state to keep your data for a lifetime

by Robert Freeman
4 June 2026

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

Complaints and Corrections

About the Canary

Meet the Team

© Canary Media Ltd 2026, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Ok

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
  • UK
  • Global
  • Opinion
  • Skwawkbox
  • Manage Subscription
  • Support
  • Features
    • Health
    • Environment
    • Science
    • Feature
    • Sport & Gaming
    • Lifestyle
    • Tech
    • Business
    • Money
    • Travel
    • Property
    • Food
    • Media
  • SHOP
  • Login
  • Sign Up
  • Cart