Beating the drums of war
Shadow defence secretary John Healey gave a speech to the Royal United Services Institute (RUSI) on Friday 26 February. It was for RUSI members only. According to its website, Healey’s speech was about:
his views on recent developments, set out the fundamentals of Labour’s defence and security policy and outline how Labour will judge the outcome of the Integrated Review.
In a press release, Healey states that:
First, Labour’s commitment to NATO is unshakeable.
Second, Labour’s support for the UK’s nuclear deterrent is non-negotiable and we want to see Britain doing more to lead efforts to secure multilateral disarmament.
Third, Labour’s commitment to international law and the UN, to universal human rights and to the multilateral treaties and organisations that uphold them is unshakable.
Read on...Support us and go ad-free
And fourth, Labour’s determination to see British investment directed first to British industry is fundamental, not just to our thinking on defence, but on the kind of society we want to build.
No more illegal wars. Introduce a Prevention of Military Intervention Act and put human rights at the heart of foreign policy. Review all UK arms sales and make us a force for international peace and justice.
Labour could still support much of that. But it’s the style of message which has changed. Healey also said that Labour is “the party of sovereign defence capability”. In other words, it wants to see defence manufacturing done here. And Healey criticised the Tories’ cuts to defence spending. So, you could say Labour is promoting ‘British bombs for British wars’.
As The Canary wrote last year, Starmer:
clearly has the ‘Red Wall’ that fell to the Tories last year at the forefront of his mind… it’s all a bit “Blue Labour” – patriotic, flag-waving and Sun-reading
And people on Twitter picked up on this.
Aping the Tories again
One user said Labour had ‘learned nothing’ since being out of government:
It's so saddening to see the Left's only parliamentary vessel learn absolutely nothing in the years since 2010https://t.co/NcSVj8OPRL
— 𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘷𝘰𝘶𝘴 𝘭𝘢𝘶𝘨𝘩𝘵𝘦𝘳🌹 (@JDSaul_) February 26, 2021
SNP MSP Tom Arthur pointed out that the idea of multilateralism isn’t clear cut:
Given the extent to which the UK's (operationally independent) nuclear weapons depends on US cooperation to remain in service, what plausible scenario is there for their (unilateral) use outwith a joint NATO strike with the US? https://t.co/0gn8IpGmhh
— Tom Arthur (@ThomasCArthur) February 25, 2021
And Patrick Samphire thought Labour was “deliberately committing to Tory policies only”:
I'm starting to wonder if there is any reason for the Labour party. They seem to be deliberately committing to Tory policies only.
Labour to state 'non-negotiable' support for UK's nuclear weapons | Labour | The Guardian https://t.co/B6aKMAF0qC
— Patrick Samphire (@patricksamphire) February 25, 2021
Starmer: dump the rebrands
As The Canary previously wrote, given Starmer’s history:
Clearly he possesses some anti-war inclinations. But he’s also willing to abandon these if he thinks it will give him political leverage.
So it seems, once again, that the force of Blue Labour-style politics is strong in the party. But Starmer has rebranded the party several times since. And yet, polling for Labour is still nosediving. And this rebranding will probably end in tears, too.
Featured image via Sky News – YouTube
Fund our Investigations Unit
You can help us investigate corruption, expose injustice and uncover the truth.
As one of the only independent investigations units in the country, we work for you – but we need your help to keep going. We need to raise £10,000 to continue our groundbreaking investigations. Can you chip in?