Everything you need to know about #Bowgate, and the media’s anti-Corbyn desperation (Tweets)

Ed Sykes

The corporate media are scared, and their constant attacks on Jeremy Corbyn and his supporters are proof of that. Now, by criticising the Labour leader on one of the most solemn days of the year, Monday’s front pages have shown the desperation of media owners more clearly than ever before.

By accusing Corbyn of not bowing his head correctly at the Cenotaph on Remembrance Sunday, a number of media sources opted yet again for demonisation rather than professionalism. Fortunately, criticism of these tactics immediately hit Twitter:

https://twitter.com/doctorcdf/status/663324206789193729

And this anger was all the more justified given the fact that Corbyn’s note on the poppy wreath he had laid read:

In memory of the fallen in all wars. Let us resolve to create a world of peace.

In other words, this was not a man who disrespected the dead but one who was committed to ensuring that no more soldiers would die in the future. What better tribute could there be for those who sacrificed their lives in past wars?

The logic of the anti-Corbyn media

As Labour campaigner James Asser pointed out on Twitter, impartiality is not a word with which the right-wing media is familiar:

While focussing on his bow, for example, Corbyn’s detractors in the media failed to report on how the Labour leader, unlike David Cameron, had endeavoured to spend time with war veterans:

For Chester University’s Dr Paul Middleton, the media’s motives were clear:

In short, the most powerful media outlets in Britain had a vested interest in maintaining the status quo and delegitimising Corbyn. As media watch group FAIR has reported:

media magnates and people on the boards of large media-related corporations enjoy close links—financial and social—with the military industry

Not surprising that they would seek to portray a pacifist as anti-patriotic, then, while letting David Cameron off the hook over his photoshopped poppy.

Workers oppose war

Contrary to the mass media narrative, says Channel 4’s Paul Mason, the first world war actually came to a close thanks to “working-class action” from German sailors who wanted the conflict to end. These workers, he asserts, had occupied the streets of Berlin and forced the Kaiser to abdicate, leaving the Social Democratic Party in charge of the new republic.

Human rights activist Peter Tatchell suggests that the same could have been true in Britain, as the country’s army during the first world war was:

notorious for its frequent appalling mistreatment of working class lower ranks by arrogant, out-of-touch upper class officers who often exploited ordinary soldiers as their personal servants and, under fire, as expendable military ordnance.

Meanwhile, he says:

For the average soldier, food was poor, accommodation insanitary, uniforms and weapons often sub-standard, wages low, recreation restricted, punishments brutal and the post-war demobilisation was delayed without good reason.

As a result, he stresses, there were “widespread military mutinies, strikes and riots” towards the end of the war (and on into 1919).

In short, says second world war veteran Harry Leslie Smith:

the past is not as simple or as clear-cut as our TV presenters like to suggest during Remembrance Sunday services

Why is the media so scared?

The stories above, however, are seldom told in the mainstream media. Working-class soldiers being mistreated and deployed at the whim of political elites, whether in Britain or Germany, are apparently not worthy of remembrance. Nor are the immense numbers of senseless deaths.

The reason for this, argues journalist Neil Clark, is that there has been “a new era of militarism” since the Falklands War, which changed the sombre remembrance of the two world wars into a tool:

to legitimize subsequent conflicts which did not have widespread public support – like the illegal invasion of Iraq

Now, he insists:

Remembrance must be saved from neo-con militarism and return to being the… less hypocritical commemoration it was in the 1970s.

And that is what Jeremy Corbyn seeks to do. By amplifying the voices of Britain’s workers and criticising the politics of death and suffering, the Labour leader has disturbed the peace among societal elites. He firmly believes that war and injustice do not have to be the destiny of the human race – and that belief puts their economic interests at risk.

First world war veteran Harry Patch wrote in his book The Last Fighting Tommy:

politicians who took us to war should have been given the guns and told to settle their differences themselves, instead of organising nothing better than legalised mass murder

For Corbyn, there are fewer causes more worthy than empowering working people so that such “legalised mass murder” never occurs again. And this is what truly worries powerful and influential media moguls today – not whether Corbyn bows, kneels, or kisses royal hands in the right way. They are worried because he presents a challenge to the political status quo.

That is why the corporate media is getting more and more desperate as the days go by.

 

To demand an apology from The Sun, please sign this petition.

Featured image via Nankai

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed