Jeremy Hunt exploits Paris attacks for political gain

Support us and go ad-free

The Department of Health (DH), headed by Jeremy Hunt, has been accused of editing a letter which uses the threat of terrorism to oppose strike action. The document referred to the Paris attacks to question how the NHS would respond if similar events occurred in the UK while the institution was left short-staffed by striking junior doctors.

The decision by junior doctors to strike follows Hunt’s failed attempts to put a positive spin on his plans to make junior doctors work even longer hours for less pay. This decision by Hunt risks damaging both medics and patients. And because the minister has been unwilling to come to a satisfactory compromise, junior doctors have been forced to take industrial action.

In 2009, Jeremy Hunt called for the NHS to be abolished, claiming it was “no longer relevant”. It, therefore, came as no surprise that his 2012 appointment as health secretary had a devastating effect on the NHS.

In 2014, Dr Éoin Clarke highlighted at his Green Benches blog 100 failures of Jeremy Hunt. Among these were 52,000 people being rejected treatment due to the costs in just one year, Hunt overseeing one of the lowest doctor-to-population rates in the EU and the longest A&E waiting times in years, £12bn of NHS contracts being awarded to private corporations, and blood plasma services being sold to a US hedge fund.

And now Hunt is determined to politicise the Paris attacks for his own purpose.

According to the Independent, the DH and the medical director of independent body NHS England, Sir Bruce Keogh, had sent emails to one another trying to make Keogh’s letter, which opposed the actions taken by junior doctors, as “hard-edged” as possible.

A DH official said that a “major incident” would be:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

pressed quite hard in the media once the strike is formally announced.

Keogh, who is meant to be independent, was then advised:

 the more hard-edged you can be on this, the better.

The letter was amended by the DH to ask if junior doctors would be able to get to a hospital if a “major incident” occurred. It was sent within a week of the Paris attacks and published the day it was announced that junior doctors would strike, even though this industrial action was called off at the last minute. But before the letter was sent, a sentence constructed by a DH official was added, stating:

I believe the best way to ensure patient safety is for the planned action not to take place.

What’s worse is that the supposedly independent medical director of NHS England decided to seek assurances directly from Jeremy Hunt just before sending the letter off to the Chair of Council at the British Medical Association:

I am sure then that JH [Jeremy Hunt] will be interested to see the proposed final product; my hope is that if you are happy to make these changes we will be able to get him over the line.

Understandably, this behaviour has caused concern for many who are uncomfortable with the fact that the DH had so much input and even substantially changed a letter from an independent body. A spokesman for the Labour party has said:

This raises a number of serious questions about the conduct of Department of Health officials and Jeremy Hunt.

When the priority is finding a resolution to the dispute the last thing we need to see is ministers and their advisors playing politics with patient care.

This whole affair places into doubt the independence of Bruce Keogh, who seems willing to take the government’s official position and even ask it to help him write his letters. It also shows the level that Jeremy Hunt is willing to go to – using something as devastating as the Paris attacks for his own political gain.

Featured image via YouTube and Flickr

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed