Steve Rotheram, the parliamentary private secretary (PPS) for Jeremy Corbyn, has been ejected from his position on the National Executive Committee (NEC) of the Labour party. The ruling was a result of an almost unanimous vote by the parliamentary Labour party that he should step down.
Rotherham was elected to the NEC as a representative of the party’s backbenches. But MPs argued that his appointment as PPS for Corbyn constitutes a frontbench position, rendering his NEC position untenable, and forced a vote on the issue. Prior to this, the party had neglected to draw up any official policy on such an occurrence. In fact, the same scenario – a PPS as a backbencher representative on the NEC – passed without incident under Gordon Brown’s leadership in his last year of government, according to the New Statesman.
The replacement for Rotherham is as yet unknown, but speculation is rife that the next MP to take the position will be a critic of Corbyn. Some have even suggested – perhaps in jest – that Michael Dugher, dismissed by Corbyn from the frontbench, should take the role.
This raises a question about what truly motivated the MPs to push for a motion on the issue when they have been entirely relaxed about codifying it before.
What is the NEC?
Continue reading below...
According to Labour, the purpose of the NEC is twofold:
The National Executive Committee is the governing body of the Labour Party that oversees the overall direction of the party and the policy-making process.
Party policy is also coordinated by the National Policy Forum (NPF), but as all members of the NEC are also members of the NPF, they are intrinsically linked.
So are there any policy issues in the pipeline that may have inspired MPs to ensure an anti-Corbyn voice is added to the NEC?
Missiles on the horizon
I want members to have a big say in it, whether that comes as a vote of individual members or a vote at conference that will be decided…My whole election programme was based on the need for ordinary people to be able to participate much more in politics so that leaders don’t go away and write policy, that executive groups don’t go off and decide what the policy is, that ordinary people do.
But a change in who decides the Labour policy on Trident would have to be predetermined at the executive level of, you guessed it, the NEC. Stacking the committee with MPs opposed to such a change, and to Corbyn himself, would severely hamper the leader’s chances of ensuring that party members can influence the official Labour position on Trident.
In light of this, the indignation that roused Labour MPs to take action over Rotheram’s position in the NEC should be treated with scepticism. It may well be that they are driven instead by the desire to protect their own power and ability to decide policy.
Learn about Trident from the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament
Write to your MP to let them know how you feel about Trident renewal.
Attend the Stop Trident demonstration on 27 February
Support The Canary so we can keep you abreast of news like this!
Since you're here ...
We know you don't need a lecture. You wouldn't be here if you didn't care.
Now, more than ever, we need your help to challenge the rightwing press and hold power to account. Please help us survive and thrive.