Daily Mail humiliated as Union Jack ban exposed as nonsense (TWEETS)
A controversial Daily Mail story about a pub landlord who was told to remove his Union Jack jacket because it might ‘offend somebody’ has been debunked.
Last week, pub landlord Jason Mawer told The Daily Mail he was asked twice to remove his cherished Union Jack jacket by ‘officials who appeared to be council enforcement officers’.
The unnamed female official, supposedly from Barnsley Council, allegedly warned him: ‘Would you mind removing your coat it might offend somebody?’
The quote was not attributed to a council employee and, according to Jason, the anonymous female official’s only defining feature was her ‘high visibility’ jacket.
He says the mysterious woman stopped him in the street before requesting that he remove the Mod-style Barbour jacket – designed in homage to British rock band The Who.
A different officer, of which there’s no description, allegedly collared him again on Saturday afternoon with a similar request, he says.
Jason, a pub owner from Barnsley, South Yorkshire said:
Read on...
It’s definitely political correctness gone mad. It’s an overused phrase but I think it definitely applies.
To be honest I was in a hurry and I was walking along as she asked me to take it off. In the end I just said, “No I’m not taking it off,” and carried on.
I thought it was ridiculous to be honest. What’s offensive about the Union Jack? I only had a T-shirt on underneath and it was raining so I would have got really wet.
It was an insult to be asked to take it off. It is my pride and joy. I’m a big fan of The Who and the Mod era and have all the gear.
The questionable story, first published by the Mail Online, went viral; subsequently appearing in The Sun, The Mirror and The Huffington Post.
It seemed political correctness had genuinely gone mad this time, and the tabloid press and mainstream media were only too happy to open a can of nationalistic worms. They had a field day.
However, Barnsley Council was quick to refute the landlord’s claims, taking to Twitter to announce that no such incident had been recorded by any of the council’s enforcement teams.
In a follow-up tweet, they said: “the council’s officers would not approach someone because of their clothes.”
No such incident has been recorded by any of the council's enforcement teams. See https://t.co/vhOK2izlPl
— Barnsley Council (@BarnsleyCouncil) February 13, 2016
And the council's officers would not approach someone because of their clothes. See https://t.co/vhOK2izlPl
— Barnsley Council (@BarnsleyCouncil) February 13, 2016
Nice try, Daily Mail, but pull the other one next time – it’s got bells on.
Get involved!
Become a member of Hacked Off, a campaign for a free and accountable press
Check out the guidelines at the Media Reform Coalition‘s website on how to help the campaign for a better industry.
Watch this documentary on corruption and political economy in the media The Fourth Estate.
Featured image via Flickr
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
