The media closes ranks to protect the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg, but the public aren’t buying it


The mainstream media has closed ranks to protect the BBC’s Political Editor, Laura Kuenssberg, but the public aren’t falling for it.

On Thursday, Labour supporters who contribute to Kuenssberg’s wages (through the TV licence fee) expressed criticism of her biased coverage by booing and hissing when she began to ask Jeremy Corbyn a question:

Related articles

There has since been wall-to-wall media coverage condemning the Labour supporters and protecting Kuenssberg from criticism:

neg cov

But it’s not just Corbyn supporters who are critical of Kuenssberg’s coverage. Former Political Editor Nick Robinson confessed he was shocked by the BBC’s anti-Corbyn coverage of the Labour leadership election in 2015, to the point where he wrote to BBC colleagues about the matter. Former BBC chairman Sir Michael Lyons has since echoed Robinson’s concerns:

I don’t think I’m alone in feeling that the BBC has sought to hedge its bets of late. There have been some quite extraordinary attacks on the elected leader of the Labour party, quite extraordinary. I can understand why people are worried about whether some of the most senior editorial voices in the BBC have lost their impartiality on this.

Criticism of Kuenssberg and the BBC’s political coverage is entirely legitimate. The bias stems from a number of issues:

  • A business- and Conservative-oriented regulatory body and leadership.
  • The Conservative government squeezing the broadcaster’s budget, leading its journalists to fear for the salaries and way of life they have become accustomed to.

And the manifestation of these fundamental issues is very clear to social media users:

And indeed, there was widespread criticism of the BBC’s ‘woeful’ coverage of the local elections.

Back in January, meanwhile, a Kuenssberg segment on BBC News at 10 felt like a party political broadcast for the Tories. Her coverage of Corbyn’s reshuffle was particularly partisan:

But now, the media has closed ranks to protect the BBC being held to account by the very people who pay the licence fee and expect a rational level of impartial coverage rather than targeted Corbyn-bashing.

One Twitter user tried to put themselves into the mindset of the mainstream media:

Omitting the legitimate concerns of licence fee payers and apparently eager for negative coverage of Corbyn, the Guardian got caught blowing the story out of all proportion. And this didn’t go unnoticed:

The reality, as Greenwald pointed out, was that Kuenssberg wasn’t prevented from asking a question. She was simply stopped for five seconds.

Meanwhile, ITV was caught quoting itself in order to authenticate its anti-Corbyn headline:

From smearing supporters of a petition calling for Kuenssberg to be dismissed as sexist to deflecting public criticism of her, the media has clearly endeavored to protect the journalist from accountability.

But the public really aren’t buying it:

The BBC has a duty to its licence fee payers to remain impartial. And therefore members of the public are perfectly entitled to hold Kuenssberg to account when there are so many counts of bias.

Get involved!

– You may like to make an official complaint about BBC bias here.

Featured image via Policy Exchange.

Fund our Investigations Unit

You can help us investigate corruption, expose injustice and uncover the truth.

As one of the only independent investigations units in the country, we work for you – but we need your help to keep going. We need to raise £10,000 to continue our groundbreaking investigations. Can you chip in?

The Canary Fund us

Comments are closed

Related articles