The media closes ranks to protect the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg, but the public aren’t buying it
The mainstream media has closed ranks to protect the BBC’s Political Editor, Laura Kuenssberg, but the public aren’t falling for it.
The booing and hissing of Laura Kuenssberg wasn't an attempt to stifle free press, it was an attempt to hold it to account
— Pendejo (@KopBlock205) June 2, 2016
On Thursday, Labour supporters who contribute to Kuenssberg’s wages (through the TV licence fee) expressed criticism of her biased coverage by booing and hissing when she began to ask Jeremy Corbyn a question:
Read on...
The BBC's Laura Kuenssberg is booed and hissed at by Jeremy Corbyn's supporters as she attempts to ask a questionhttps://t.co/wzfxtCyhuP
— ITV News (@itvnews) June 2, 2016
There has since been wall-to-wall media coverage condemning the Labour supporters and protecting Kuenssberg from criticism:
But it’s not just Corbyn supporters who are critical of Kuenssberg’s coverage. Former Political Editor Nick Robinson confessed he was shocked by the BBC’s anti-Corbyn coverage of the Labour leadership election in 2015, to the point where he wrote to BBC colleagues about the matter. Former BBC chairman Sir Michael Lyons has since echoed Robinson’s concerns:
I don’t think I’m alone in feeling that the BBC has sought to hedge its bets of late. There have been some quite extraordinary attacks on the elected leader of the Labour party, quite extraordinary. I can understand why people are worried about whether some of the most senior editorial voices in the BBC have lost their impartiality on this.
Criticism of Kuenssberg and the BBC’s political coverage is entirely legitimate. The bias stems from a number of issues:
- A business- and Conservative-oriented regulatory body and leadership.
- The Conservative government squeezing the broadcaster’s budget, leading its journalists to fear for the salaries and way of life they have become accustomed to.
And the manifestation of these fundamental issues is very clear to social media users:
Is there a BBC producer in @bbclaurak 's earpiece? Or Conservative Central Office? Woeful anti Labour bias. Woeful.
— Stan Collymore (@StanCollymore) May 6, 2016
And indeed, there was widespread criticism of the BBC’s ‘woeful’ coverage of the local elections.
Back in January, meanwhile, a Kuenssberg segment on BBC News at 10 felt like a party political broadcast for the Tories. Her coverage of Corbyn’s reshuffle was particularly partisan:
BBC political editor @bbclaurak 2016 tweets so far:
Rail fares – 0
Housing – 0
Floods – 1
EU negotiations – 8
Labour reshuffle – 30— Tom Pride (@ThomasPride) January 5, 2016
But now, the media has closed ranks to protect the BBC being held to account by the very people who pay the licence fee and expect a rational level of impartial coverage rather than targeted Corbyn-bashing.
One Twitter user tried to put themselves into the mindset of the mainstream media:
How dare these people speak out of turn, express any criticism of Laura Kuenssberg or any public figure; don't they know their place? RT
— I'm Alright Jack – It's Every Man For Himself (@IamalrightJack) June 2, 2016
Omitting the legitimate concerns of licence fee payers and apparently eager for negative coverage of Corbyn, the Guardian got caught blowing the story out of all proportion. And this didn’t go unnoticed:
Dear @guardian: your headline is disproven by the video you posted right underneath it https://t.co/uzUnJ1INSh pic.twitter.com/KycOBVgvuz
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) June 2, 2016
The reality, as Greenwald pointed out, was that Kuenssberg wasn’t prevented from asking a question. She was simply stopped for five seconds.
Meanwhile, ITV was caught quoting itself in order to authenticate its anti-Corbyn headline:
Look at this ridiculous headline, then look at the source Tweet (ITV journo): ITV is literally quoting itself https://t.co/7NmycZ8bRj
— Asa Winstanley (@AsaWinstanley) June 2, 2016
From smearing supporters of a petition calling for Kuenssberg to be dismissed as sexist to deflecting public criticism of her, the media has clearly endeavored to protect the journalist from accountability.
But the public really aren’t buying it:
Cue endless, fatuous commentary calling Laura Kuenssberg victim of sexist campaign, the dark side of left activism, the Twitter mob etc etc
— Tim Holmes (@timbird84) June 2, 2016
Laura Kuenssberg booed is a scandal but daily murder of #Kurds is just fine for supine British media.
— AnotherGreen (@Anothergreen) June 2, 2016
When I saw the journo Twitter outrage over this, I expected menacing behavior. WATCH VIDEO: https://t.co/uzUnJ1INSh https://t.co/V6Z10dhwMH
— Glenn Greenwald (@ggreenwald) June 2, 2016
The people defending Laura Kuenssberg after a midly & very British show of disapproval by the audience would probably defend Lord Haw Haw
— Kanjin Tor ™ (@xugla) June 2, 2016
REALITY: That lovely Jeremy Corbyn stuck up for unpopular BBC hack Laura Kuenssberg when some people booed her. https://t.co/FshloeyEhy
— Will Black (@WillBlackWriter) June 2, 2016
The BBC has a duty to its licence fee payers to remain impartial. And therefore members of the public are perfectly entitled to hold Kuenssberg to account when there are so many counts of bias.
Get involved!
– You may like to make an official complaint about BBC bias here.
Featured image via Policy Exchange.
We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support
The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.
The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.
So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.
