• Disrupting Power Since 2015
  • Donate
  • Login
Thursday, May 15, 2025
  • Login
  • Register
Canary
MEDIA THAT DISRUPTS
  • News
    • UK
    • Global
    • Analysis
    • Trending
  • Editorial
  • Features
    • Features
    • Environment
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Money
    • Science
    • Business
    • Tech
    • Travel
    • Sport & Gaming
  • Media
    • Video
    • Cartoons
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
MANAGE SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPORT
  • News
    • UK
    • Global
    • Analysis
    • Trending
  • Editorial
  • Features
    • Features
    • Environment
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Money
    • Science
    • Business
    • Tech
    • Travel
    • Sport & Gaming
  • Media
    • Video
    • Cartoons
  • Opinion
No Result
View All Result
Canary
No Result
View All Result

Thousands of police officers are getting body-worn cameras, there’s just one massive problem

Emily Apple by Emily Apple
18 October 2016
in UK
Reading Time: 3 mins read
162 10
A A
0
Home UK
319
SHARES
2.5k
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

The Metropolitan Police are issuing body-worn cameras to 22,000 front-line officers. The cameras are being touted as a way to improve police accountability, but there is a massive problem. No one is saying what will happen to the reams of data recorded by the units.

The data

All footage from the cameras is automatically logged on a secure server. According to the Met police:

Video not retained as evidence or for a policing purpose is automatically deleted within 31 days.

But it is this ambiguous term – “policing purpose” – which causes problems. A “policing purpose” is commonly defined as:

the investigation, detection and prevention of crime.

The problem is highlighted by the ways police already retain data on political activists. Protesters are routinely monitored and those included on the domestic extremist databases include journalists, politicians and other people without convictions.

Previously, the police have admitted that it only takes two factors to be included on the database. This can include attending several demonstrations and talking to people already on the database. Furthermore, the police will go to extreme lengths to gather this data, including tactics such as stop-and-searches and mass arrests.

Therefore, a legitimate “policing purpose” could include keeping footage of protesters, even if they haven’t committed any criminal acts. As such, with these body cameras, it is possible that the police could gain and keep even more data for possible prosecutions in the future.

Which law?

Perhaps even more shocking, the police appear unsure which law allows people to request the footage of themselves. According to the Met police website:

If the public wish to view footage taken of them they can request, in writing, to obtain it under freedom of information, data protection laws.

The problem is, these are two different acts with very different criteria. Furthermore, if a person is requesting their own footage, they would not be able to access that data through a freedom of information request. The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) makes this clear:

If the information constitutes the personal data of the requester, then it is exempt from disclosure. This is an absolute exemption, and there is no duty to confirm or deny whether the information is held.

The ICO continues, saying that any request for personal data should be made through a Data Protection Act (DPA) request:

Instead, the public authority should deal with the request as a subject access request under the DPA.

But for the police, as their own website suggests, to be unclear on how a person can access their data speaks volumes about their attitudes towards the data they are collecting.

Other problems

The police can also pick and choose when they turn their cameras on, so it will still not necessarily mean that the many incidences of police brutality will be recorded. And while there are claims that the use of body-worn cameras has led to fewer complaints against officers and more guilty pleas, the Independent Police Complaints Commission said they were “not fit for purpose for firearms incidents”.

We should all want a police force that is more accountable. But a system which can easily be used for mass surveillance, with a police force which does not even now how a person can access their data, is not the answer.

Get Involved!

– Know your rights. Find out more and/or attend a training session.

– Sign up to the Network for Police Monitoring’s email list.

Featured image author’s own

Share128Tweet80
Previous Post

A police officer treated this 13-year-old girl ‘like a piece of meat’ over a playground dispute [VIDEO]

Next Post

Ken Loach just exposed how TV broadcasters make people obey power, leaving the BBC red-faced

Next Post
Ken Loach just exposed how TV broadcasters make people obey power, leaving the BBC red-faced

Ken Loach just exposed how TV broadcasters make people obey power, leaving the BBC red-faced

Boris Johnson and David Cameron

Now we finally know the real reason for Brexit, the media silence is deafening

Referendum ‘about as legal as anything else we’ve done’, shrugs Theresa May

Referendum 'about as legal as anything else we've done', shrugs Theresa May

Britain’s most hated estate agent just got some terrible news

Britain's most hated estate agent just got some terrible news

Brazil is about to pass a law to embrace austerity, for the next 20 years

Brazil is about to pass a law to embrace austerity, for the next 20 years

The British Museum just held an event with the Israeli embassy - and the Met police responded by repressing Palestine protesters
News

British Museum holds event with the Israeli embassy – so Met Police respond by repressing Palestine protesters

by The Canary
14 May 2025
EXPOSED: the public is paying for Keir Starmer's in-laws to live virtually rent-free in London
Analysis

EXPOSED: the public is paying for Keir Starmer’s in-laws to live virtually rent-free in London

by Ed Sykes
14 May 2025
People are coming together on 7 June to oppose Labour's DWP benefit cuts
News

People are coming together on 7 June to oppose Labour’s DWP benefit cuts

by The Canary
14 May 2025
Keir Starmer's 'Island of Strangers' speech: channeling the racist rhetoric of Enoch Powell
Opinion

Is Keir Starmer capable of killing?

by Jamie Driscoll
14 May 2025
As an ACTUAL GENOCIDE continues, its apologists come for Gary Lineker over an emoji
Opinion

As an ACTUAL GENOCIDE continues, its apologists come for Gary Lineker over an emoji

by Ed Sykes
14 May 2025
  • Contact
  • About & FAQ
  • Get our Daily News Email
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

The Canary
PO Box 71199
LONDON
SE20 9EX

Canary Media Ltd – registered in England. Company registration number 09788095.

For guest posting, contact [email protected]

For other enquiries, contact: [email protected]

The Canary is owned and run by independent journalists and volunteers, NOT offshore billionaires.

You can write for us, or support us by making a regular or one-off donation.

© Canary Media Ltd 2024, all rights reserved | Website by Monster | Hosted by Krystal | Privacy Settings

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • News
    • UK
    • Global
    • Analysis
    • Trending
  • Editorial
  • Features
    • Features
    • Environment
    • Lifestyle
    • Health
    • Money
    • Science
    • Business
    • Tech
    • Travel
    • Sport & Gaming
  • Media
    • Video
    • Cartoons
  • Opinion

© 2023 Canary - Worker's co-op.

Before you go, have you seen...?

The British Museum just held an event with the Israeli embassy - and the Met police responded by repressing Palestine protesters
News
The Canary

British Museum holds event with the Israeli embassy – so Met Police respond by repressing Palestine protesters

EXPOSED: the public is paying for Keir Starmer's in-laws to live virtually rent-free in London
Analysis
Ed Sykes

EXPOSED: the public is paying for Keir Starmer’s in-laws to live virtually rent-free in London

People are coming together on 7 June to oppose Labour's DWP benefit cuts
News
The Canary

People are coming together on 7 June to oppose Labour’s DWP benefit cuts

Keir Starmer's 'Island of Strangers' speech: channeling the racist rhetoric of Enoch Powell
Opinion
Jamie Driscoll

Is Keir Starmer capable of killing?

ADVERTISEMENT
Business
Nathan Spears

When digital isn’t enough: why paper still matters in modern business

Tech
Nathan Spears

How Digital Addictions Are Formed in the Shadow of Large Platforms

Lifestyle
Nathan Spears

Recovery in the Sun: How the Canary Islands are Becoming a Wellness Tourism Hub