The BBC has scolded its Political Editor Laura Kuenssberg for a “failure of due accuracy” in a report on Jeremy Corbyn.
Leaked to The Herald, the “drafted findings” by watchdog the BBC Trust uphold a viewer’s complaint against the Political Editor. The complaint argued that Kuenssberg misrepresented the Labour leader’s ‘shoot-to-kill’ policy in a BBC News at Six item on the November 2015 Paris attacks.
Kuenssberg claimed she had asked Corbyn whether he would be happy for officers to pull the trigger if a Paris-style attack took place in the UK, according to a BBC Trust document.
But the complaint asserted that the question she had asked Corbyn in the original interview was “substantially different” to how she paraphrased it on BBC News.
In the longer interview, Kuenssberg asked:
But if you were Prime Minister, would you be happy to order people – police or military – to shoot to kill on Britain’s streets?
I’m not happy with a shoot-to-kill policy in general. I think that is quite dangerous and I think can often be counter-productive. I think you have to have security that prevents people firing off weapons where you can.
A “failure of due accuracy”
Upholding the complaint, the Trust’s Editorial Standards Committee (ESC) concluded:
He [Corbyn] was asked about “shoot-to-kill” and he gave an answer about his views on “shoot-to-kill”, but in the News at Six piece it was presented as him not supporting armed engagement in an ongoing hostage situation – a scenario that was not put to him.
The ESC also stated:
The Committee decided there was a significant difference between what Mr Corbyn said and what the report inferred. This had led to a failure of due accuracy.
The alleged inaccurate paraphrasing would likely reinforce the perception that Corbyn is too ‘soft’ on the hot-button issue of terrorism.
A BBC Trust spokesman said:
We don’t comment on any leaked appeal ahead of its publication. This finding isn’t finalised yet and will be published following the next Editorial Standards Committee meeting.
Meanwhile, BBC News contested the report:
BBC News does not accept the assertions made and the complaint has been rejected on four separate occasions already.
The Trust has not published a finding regarding this appeal and BBC News has further evidence it is still to present this month before that happens.
This watchdog needs dentures
Many BBC viewers will be wondering where the watchdog has been all this time.
Expanding on its conclusion, the BBC Trust said there was “no evidence” to suggest the misrepresentation was intentional. But it stated:
Trustees considered that the effect of the failures to observe due accuracy had, on this occasion, also resulted in a failure of impartiality
But this is not the only occasion the Political Editor has been accused of breaching impartiality guidelines. Kuenssberg’s reporting has been beset with allegations of severe bias from BBC viewers, concerned with her balance. In May 2016, a petition to replace her for pro-Conservative bias gained 35,000 signatures in a handful of days. 38 Degrees removed the petition after politicians and the mainstream media peddled a fake smear campaign against its supporters.
It may come as no surprise that the BBC Trust finds no issue with Kuenssberg’s general reporting. Rona Fairhead, the sitting BBC Trust chairwoman, has entrenched ties to the Tory government. In fact, she and George Osborne are old friends. She worked for the Conservative government as a Cabinet Office member, until being appointed by the former Conservative Culture Secretary – Sajid Javid – as the new head of the BBC Trust. She remained Business Ambassador for David Cameron when she took on the role as Chairwoman. And she also sits on the board of HSBC directors and PepsiCo.
This is the person leading the BBC’s regulatory watchdog.
Better than the standard corporate media procedure for Corbyn
The academic evidence suggests that even this instance of alleged inaccurate reporting from Kuenssberg may be better than the wider mainstream media. A report published by the London School of Economics and Political Science found strong media bias against Corbyn, claiming the press had turned into an “attack dog” against the opposition leader. According to the report, 56% of the Corbyn-related articles analysed did not give the Labour leader a voice at all.
A closer look at the BBC Trust reveals more of a lapdog than a watchdog. So it comes as no surprise that this is the only reported instance where a complaint against Kuenssberg has been upheld in “drafted findings” or otherwise by the regulatory body. The BBC needs to clean up its act and offer the public service licence fee payers deserve.
– You may like to make an official complaint about BBC bias here.
– You might also like to remind Laura Kuenssberg very politely about her responsibilities as a public service broadcaster.
– Support The Canary, so we can continue to step in where mainstream outlets like the BBC fail.
Featured image via Wikimedia
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?