The Telegraph is under investigation by the press regulator, for printing what an independent researcher described as “inflammatory” and “xenophobic” comments about minority communities. The article contained falsehoods about a government scheme to force people to show ID when they vote, and inflated fears of voter fraud being a higher risk in Muslim communities. But in doing so, The Telegraph ignored the biggest elephant in the room: Tory election fraud.
Locking-out four million voters
The Telegraph published the article in question on 27 December 2016. The article reported on pilot schemes of the government’s plans to make voters show passports or driving licences at polling booths when they vote. As The Canary previously reported, former Conservative Cabinet Minister Eric Pickles has drawn up the plans for the government, outlining his recommendations for tackling electoral fraud. But his recommendations will fail to tackle fraud by political parties – and could mean around four million people would be unable to vote.
But Joel Benjamin, an independent researcher working with The Canary, made a complaint about the paper’s article to the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO).
In its original article, The Telegraph stated:
Voters in towns and cities with large Muslim communities where there are concerns about election fraud will have to show their passports or driving licences before casting their ballot. The Government is also considering checking people’s nationality to prevent immigrants who are not entitled to take part in UK elections from voting.
[The Electoral Commission] has warned [of] the ‘vulnerability of some South Asian communities, specifically those with roots in parts of Pakistan or Bangladesh, to electoral fraud’. The move comes after Sir Eric Pickles… warned earlier this year that election fraud had been allowed to take place in Muslim communities because of ‘political correctness’.
“Xenophobic and inflammatory”
The complaint to IPSO said The Telegraph was “conflating fraud risk and vulnerable areas with Muslim areas”. And that its article bordered on the “xenophobic and inflammatory”. But the paper stated it was merely echoing Electoral Commission (EC) findings, saying:
The scheme is based on the Electoral Commission’s 2014 report. In the chapter headed ‘Tackling the risk of electoral fraud in specific areas’, the selected areas were identified as places ‘where there appears to be a greater risk of cases of alleged electoral fraud being reported’.
What The Telegraph failed to admit was that framing electoral fraud as a Muslim issue was inaccurate. It chose to ignore parts of the same EC report it used for its article, which stated [pdf p20]:
It would be a mistake to suggest that electoral fraud only takes place within specific South Asian communities.
Nor did The Telegraph acknowledge any problem with saying most South East Asian communities were Muslim. Regardless of the fact that not all these communities are Muslim, and not all Muslims are from South East Asia.
The original article implied that the pilot scheme was compulsory for the 18 local authorities involved. But The Telegraph has admitted this was inaccurate, saying:
We accept that there is currently no element of compulsion in the Government’s proposals… We accept that this is an inaccuracy that warrants amendment/correction under the Editors’ Code.
The complaint also accused the paper of printing a misleading headline. The original headline on its website was:
But implying that polling booths will only accept passports as ID is not correct. As voters can use driving licences as well. The paper said that it explained in its opening paragraph that voters could use both forms of ID, but that it could have “better worded” its headline. The paper has since changed the online version to read “ID” not “passports”.
The Canary approached the Electoral Commission for comment. It said:
This isn’t one for us to comment on, we don’t regulate what newspapers print.
The real electoral fraud problem
It appears fairly obvious what The Telegraph was doing with its article. From its original headline stating that voters in Muslim communities would have to show passports to focusing on checking people’s nationalities, The Telegraph was trying to frame electoral fraud as a Muslim problem.
But the paper ignored the fact that electoral fraud by voters is a tiny issue. Evidence passed to The Canary from the Electoral Commission shows that, of 98.4 million votes cast between 2010-2012, it investigated 948 for suspected electoral fraud. And only three of these ever went to court. That means 0.000003% of all votes cast were fraudulent.
The Telegraph seems to be greatly concerned about election fraud. And the Cabinet Office says [pdf, p11] there should be a “zero tolerance” approach to electoral fraud by migrants. Let’s hope that both organisations show the same level of scrutiny when it comes to apparent electoral fraud committed by the Conservative Party.
– Read articles from The Canary on Tory Election Fraud.
– Support The Canary, so we can keep bringing you the news that matters.
Featured image via The Canary/Wikimedia Commons
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?