Independent Media | Campaigning Journalism
The confrontation between Nigel Farage and a Channel 4 News journalist did not end well for UKIP [VIDEO]
Nigel Farage found himself entirely out of his depth when up against Channel 4 News correspondent Ciaran Jenkins on 22 February. The former UKIP leader misrepresented data to claim Sweden was the rape capital of Europe due to Muslim immigrants. A claim that was soon to be taken apart entirely.
The Sweden incident
On 20 February, Nigel Farage attempted to provide ‘evidence’ for claims by US President Donald Trump that Sweden is suffering a rape crisis due to high immigration. Using the platform granted him by LBC radio, Farage stated to thousands of listeners that, due to Muslim immigration, “Malmo is now the rape capital of Europe”.
Malmo in Sweden is the rape capital of Europe due to EU migrant policies. Anyone who says there isn't a problem is lying to you. pic.twitter.com/Aw7GvsECeX
— Nigel Farage (@Nigel_Farage) February 20, 2017
Facing a challenge, Farage tweeted what he claimed to be a UN graph that appeared to back his claims.
Read on...
Reported rapes in Sweden trebled from 2003-2010. The UN graph below says it all. But @BuzzFeedUK want to pretend there is no problem. pic.twitter.com/UNPU45q4tg
— Nigel Farage (@Nigel_Farage) February 21, 2017
While the chart pleased UKIP and Trump supporters, Channel 4 News correspondent Ciaran Jenkins decided to fact-check Farage in real time. Across several tweets, Jenkins debunked Farage’s claims entirely. It turns out the UN never made this graph. And a look at actual UN charts reveals a major rape issue. Not for Sweden, but for the United States.
Farage gets the Channel 4 News treatment
Viewers have come to expect straightforward and high-quality journalism from the team at Channel 4 News. And Jenkins stayed true to form during the exchange. He began politely, and retained his composure throughout. Systematically picking Farage apart.
Respectfully @Nigel_Farage the "UN graph below" does not "say it all". pic.twitter.com/QTfDyWeWWJ
— Ciaran Jenkins (@C4Ciaran) February 22, 2017
He began with the misrepresentation of data.
The data comes from the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. It comes with this crucial caveat: pic.twitter.com/3466MeKDQT
— Ciaran Jenkins (@C4Ciaran) February 22, 2017
Respectfully, saying the "UN graph says it all" does not appear to be exercising the "caution" that the source of the data advises.
— Ciaran Jenkins (@C4Ciaran) February 22, 2017
As Tim Newburn, Professor of Criminology, explains to Buzzfeed News: pic.twitter.com/RbwsjnFFKp
— Ciaran Jenkins (@C4Ciaran) February 22, 2017
Then, Jenkins moved on to share the actual position of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). Because it was this organisation’s data that Farage misrepresented in the graph.
UNODC research provides important context for understanding sexual violence statistics around the world.
— Ciaran Jenkins (@C4Ciaran) February 22, 2017
On that point, here is a graph the UNODC did produce. They did not produce then graph you attribute to them. pic.twitter.com/FvT2pSlWzM
— Ciaran Jenkins (@C4Ciaran) February 22, 2017
Sweden scores 3/3 on enforcing sexual violence laws.
Source: UNODC pic.twitter.com/T7WCPWfOgI— Ciaran Jenkins (@C4Ciaran) February 22, 2017
USA scores 2/3 on enforcing sexual violence laws.
Source: UNODC pic.twitter.com/sK9RIUGAuC— Ciaran Jenkins (@C4Ciaran) February 22, 2017
Why the focus on a country that does enforce rape laws rather than those that do not?
Where is the greater threat to victims?
— Ciaran Jenkins (@C4Ciaran) February 22, 2017
Winning Twitter wars is not enough
The critical issue is that, as is becoming a frequent occurrence, the facts seemingly made no impact on the supporters of Farage or Trump.
Do you know what you can do with your fucking chart?
— TCPATRIOT (@yankeeclipper68) February 22, 2017
Given the choice between a lie which validated their bigotry and truth which challenged it, they opted for the former. And this is the real challenge facing opponents of the far-right, from liberals through to anti-fascists: how do you change minds which have no desire to change?
History would suggest that, instead of courting the far-right, we need to repair the bridges between the majority which don’t follow their ideology. The liberals, the left, the progressives, the anti-fascists. Because the narrow confines of the liberal establishment cannot win this battle on its own. It must wake up to the fact that the progressives to its left are allies, instead of treating them as the left fork of an extremist pincer movement. That way, the far-right will be outnumbered and outgunned where it counts – in the battle of ideas.
Get Involved!
– Support The Canary, so we can keep bringing you the news that matters.
Featured image via YouTube Screengrab
Do your bit for independent journalism
Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.
We need you to help out, if you can.
When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.
You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.
In return you get:
- Advert free reading experience
- Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
- 20% discount from our shop
Fund us 