The confrontation between Nigel Farage and a Channel 4 News journalist did not end well for UKIP [VIDEO]

Kerry-anne Mendoza


Nigel Farage found himself entirely out of his depth when up against Channel 4 News correspondent Ciaran Jenkins on 22 February. The former UKIP leader misrepresented data to claim Sweden was the rape capital of Europe due to Muslim immigrants. A claim that was soon to be taken apart entirely.

The Sweden incident

On 20 February, Nigel Farage attempted to provide ‘evidence’ for claims by US President Donald Trump that Sweden is suffering a rape crisis due to high immigration. Using the platform granted him by LBC radio, Farage stated to thousands of listeners that, due to Muslim immigration, “Malmo is now the rape capital of Europe”.

Facing a challenge, Farage tweeted what he claimed to be a UN graph that appeared to back his claims.

Related articles

While the chart pleased UKIP and Trump supporters, Channel 4 News correspondent Ciaran Jenkins decided to fact-check Farage in real time. Across several tweets, Jenkins debunked Farage’s claims entirely. It turns out the UN never made this graph. And a look at actual UN charts reveals a major rape issue. Not for Sweden, but for the United States.

Farage gets the Channel 4 News treatment

Viewers have come to expect straightforward and high-quality journalism from the team at Channel 4 News. And Jenkins stayed true to form during the exchange. He began politely, and retained his composure throughout. Systematically picking Farage apart.

He began with the misrepresentation of data.

Then, Jenkins moved on to share the actual position of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). Because it was this organisation’s data that Farage misrepresented in the graph.

Winning Twitter wars is not enough

The critical issue is that, as is becoming a frequent occurrence, the facts seemingly made no impact on the supporters of Farage or Trump.

Given the choice between a lie which validated their bigotry and truth which challenged it, they opted for the former. And this is the real challenge facing opponents of the far-right, from liberals through to anti-fascists: how do you change minds which have no desire to change?

History would suggest that, instead of courting the far-right, we need to repair the bridges between the majority which don’t follow their ideology. The liberals, the left, the progressives, the anti-fascists. Because the narrow confines of the liberal establishment cannot win this battle on its own. It must wake up to the fact that the progressives to its left are allies, instead of treating them as the left fork of an extremist pincer movement. That way, the far-right will be outnumbered and outgunned where it counts – in the battle of ideas.

Get Involved!

– Support The Canary, so we can keep bringing you the news that matters.

Featured image via YouTube Screengrab

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed

Related articles