We compared the Tories’ policies to a BNP manifesto. And bloody hell [VIDEO]

Theresa May Tories Nick Griffin BNP
Support us and go ad-free

Theresa May has refused to take part in televised leadership debates for the general election. And one reason may be because she knows her government’s policies and record would not stand up to scrutiny. But one journalist did scrutinise the Tories’ policies – comparing them to those of the British National Party (BNP) in 2005, under then leader Nick Griffin. And the results are shocking.

May vs Griffin

Craig Murray is an author, broadcaster and human rights activist. He was British Ambassador to Uzbekistan from August 2002 to October 2004. And in a recent article, he asked “Can anybody find any significant difference between May’s policies and the BNP manifesto of 2005?” Murray noted that both the Tories and the BNP advocate:

BNP Manifesto Two

So, The Canary took a closer look at the BNP 2005 manifesto. And it found that there were more similarities between Tory policy and BNP pledges. But also that the latter was actually far more left wing than the current Conservative government.

On top of what Murray noted, The Canary also found that the BNP:

  • Wanted [pdf p.32] a National Service scheme, much like the Tories’ National Citizenship Scheme.
  • Said it would [pdf p.32] “De-fund nonsense disciplines” in universities. The Tories’ actions have led to cuts of more than 25% of degree courses since 2010.

Christian values?

The BNP also called [pdf p.22] for “commitment to the values of traditional… Christianity”. Much like May’s Easter message:

Read on...

Also, like the Tories’ British Bill of Rights, the BNP proposed [pdf p.12] a Bill of Rights based on the Magna Carta. But while the current government are doing it to pick and choose people’s rights after leaving the EU, the BNP had a different reason. It said [pdf p.12] a Bill of Rights would:

…alert a future generation to the fact that, as is the way of the world, a ruling class has arisen that has once again come to think of itself as more important than those in whose name it governs.

But here’s where the BNP began to differ from the Tories.

The BNP leaning left?

It included the following section [pdf p.8] in its manifesto on “Dismantling the repressive State”:

BNP Manifesto One

And compared to May’s proposed Counter-extremism and Safeguarding Bill, it seems quite liberal. The bill was to include:

…new civil orders to ban extremist groups, restrict the behaviour of extremist individuals, and to close down premises used for extremist purposes. The Bill would also provide Ofcom with powers to censor extremist content, and enable employers to conduct checks on employees for involvement in extremism.

But Index on Censorship criticised the bill, which it said could have ended up “silencing us all”. Simon Calvert of the Christian Institute warned that the bill could make the type of people labelled as “extremist” “a whole lot wider”. Index on Censorship also said that it would “threaten free speech”, and that its civil liberties orders were “draconian measures”:

We should resist any attempts to make it a crime for people of faith to talk publicly about their beliefs, for political parties to voice unpopular views, and for venues from universities to village halls to host anyone whose opinions challenge the status quo.


The BNP manifesto also called for the following:

  • Dismantling [pdf p.9] the “dictatorship” that is the UK media, ending “the era where the big media barons and news corporations could control public opinion through printing lies”.
  • Reform of the House of Lords, to make [pdf p.11]  it “a body which gives more weight to experience in certain fields, involvement in charities and community groups”.
  • Teaching [pdf p.23] of ancestral languages like Cornish, Gaelic and Manx in schools. And that music tuition should be compulsory as well.
  • Changing [pdf p.24] policing laws to make sure it was a “servant of the people, not of the State”. And ending “militarised and pseudo-hi-tech” policing in favour of ‘bobbies on the beat’.
  • A free and fully funded NHS, because [pdf p.26] it “is actually very good value for money – the problem is that we do not put enough money into ‘front-end’ staff”.
  • Ensuring [pdf p.29] pensioners didn’t have to sell their homes to pay for nursing care.
  • Implementing [pdf p.38] worker-ownership cooperatives of businesses; creating “an entire new class of independent family farms” with a focus [pdf p.47] on organic farming, and turning the likes of Tesco into community-run “urban markets”.

The Tories and the BNP: separated at birth?

Let’s be very clear. The BNP did not base its 2005 manifesto on some left wing, egalitarian ideology. It was manipulating the public, based on racist, nationalist beliefs that advocated a hatred of anyone who differed from its white, supremacist ideals. But the BNP manifesto shows how far the mainstream political debate has shifted to the right. What were once considered extreme, fringe views have seeped into ordinary political beliefs. And the current Conservative government shows how far-right views can be sold to the public as trying to build (as May said) a “stronger, fairer Britain that truly does work for everyone”.

So don’t be fooled. May and Griffin are closer in their beliefs than you think.

Get Involved!

Register to vote in the 8 June general election. If you don’t have a national insurance number, a 5 minute phone call on 0300 200 3500 will get it sent to you in ten days.

– Discuss the key policy issues with family members, colleagues and neighbours. And organise! Join (and participate in the activities of) a union, an activist group, and/or a political party.

– Also read more Canary articles on the 2017 general election.

Featured image via screengrab/Wikimedia

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us

Comments are closed