Since the Labour Party released its manifesto, the mainstream media has typically come out with all guns blazing. As have politicians from other parties. But other powerful groups have also criticised Labour’s plans.
And their intervention cuts to the heart of what’s at stake in the coming general election.
The ‘big’ state
Business groups and leaders have spoken out about Labour’s proposals. Some they said deserve “three cheers”, such as investment in infrastructure and a skills boost through education. But they’re hostile to the introduction of pay ratios and a ban on zero hours contracts. And they had one major criticism of the overall direction of manifesto. Director-general of the Confederation of British Industry (CBI), Carolyn Fairbairn, explained:
Labour’s proposals taken as a whole prioritise state intervention over enterprise, and fail to offer the pro-growth and competitiveness agenda the country so badly needs.
The “state intervention” Labour has proposed involves bringing rail, water, the Royal Mail, and part of the energy sector into public ownership. This, Fairbairn asserts, will damage “growth”. But growth for whom? Because with the hugely profitable nature of these industries, it’s certainly going to grow the Treasury’s budget; a stockpile that the UK public officially owns. And one that its chosen government can then reinvest to benefit them directly.
The tax ‘bombshell’
Unsurprisingly, the business community didn’t condemn the Conservative government when it ‘intervened‘ heavily in tax affairs; to the detriment of its own public purse. Before 2010, when the Conservatives formed a government with the Lib Dems, corporation tax was set at 28%. It’s currently charged at 19%. And the Tory government planned to cut it to 17% by 2020.
In contrast, Labour has now said it will raise corporation to 26% by 2020. Right-wing media platforms are describing this rise as a bombshell. Yet it is a less dramatic increase than the Tories’ decrease of corporation tax. So why is a tragedy playing out across the UK’s front pages?
Because it changes the balance of who tax policy benefits; the public will be better off if corporation tax is higher. Although 26% is still by far a better rate for businesses when compared to other competitive countries.
Another criticism of Labour’s plans surrounds the costs it will incur, and the borrowing that will be necessary to fund them. Channel 4‘s Cathy Newman, for example, accused Labour’s Emily Thornberry of putting forward plans that will leave the country with “no money left”.
Yet it’s rare for the media to explicitly raise the Conservative government’s record on borrowing. David Cameron inherited a national debt of £811.3bn when he became prime minister in 2010. That debt has now increased to £1,729.5bn. So the Tories have more than doubled the debt, by £918.2bn, in their seven years in government.
And what does the British public have to show for it?
Taking back control
In Labour’s Negotiating Brexit section of its manifesto, the following statement is made:
For many people and for much of our country, power can feel just as remote and unaccountable in Westminster as it does in Brussels. So a Labour government will seek to put powers as close to communities as possible.
And this sentiment, of giving power back to the people, is not exclusive to the manifesto. It has permeated the party since Corbyn became leader. Although such public ‘intervention’ is usually scorned by Conservatives in parliament.
But that’s what Labour is offering to the public. It’s a plan that will mean essential services are run by the public, in their interests, and the proceeds from those services will return to the public. And yes, Labour will have to borrow to fund the transition, as the Conservatives have done extensively over the last seven years, but then these services will belong to us all.
That is what’s at stake in this general election. So it’s fundamentally a question of whether the UK public is ready to go all in, and really take back control.
– Register to vote in the 8 June general election.
– Read the Labour manifesto in full here.
– Discuss the key policy issues with family members, colleagues and neighbours.
– Also read more Canary articles on the 2017 general election.
Featured image via Chatham House/Flickr
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?