On Friday 2 June, journalist Paul Mason appeared on BBC Newsnight, alongside LBC presenter Iain Dale and Lib Dem adviser Polly Mackenzie. Host Emily Maitlis was in the chair. But to say she had her work cut out trying to control the debate would be an understatement. But despite the constant interruptions, Mason absolutely nailed every criticism of Jeremy Corbyn that was thrown at him.
Maitlis opened the debate by saying [31.35] the trio “had been very good at not being too tribal up until this point”. Something she probably lived to regret. As from the off, Dale was immediately on the attack against Mason.
Mason began by asserting that Theresa May and Corbyn had, up until this point, “failed to be quizzed expertly” in the various debates and interviews they had taken part in. But Dale attempted to turn this back on Mason, by referring to the abuse BBC Radio Five Live presenter Emma Barnett had received. Mason, however, wasn’t being distracted:
Corbyn “found out”. Allegedly
Dale disagreed with Mason’s assertion on the leaders’ interviews, claiming that politicians are sometimes like “gulping goldfishes”, getting “found out” when questioned by the public. And he went on to say that after the Question Time special earlier that evening, Corbyn had been “found out”:
Corbyn has repeatedly condemned the terrorist atrocities committed by the IRA. For example, as early as 1994 the now Labour leader signed a motion in parliament condemning IRA actions. So, it is unclear what part of this Dale misunderstood.
Mason nailing it
The debate then shifted to the panel’s predictions for the outcome of the election. Both Dale and Mackenzie said they were expecting a Tory majority. But Mason had a different view, and nailed his point perfectly:
The polls generally reflect the assertion that Labour needs young people to vote. It has a strong lead over the Conservatives among under-40s, according to YouGov. And student support for Labour has leapt to 55% under Jeremy Corbyn, according to research from the Higher Education Policy Institute (Hepi) and YouthSight. In comparison, student support for Labour was at 35% towards the end of Ed Miliband’s leadership in 2015. And under Tony Blair in 2005, only 23% backed Labour. And with 1 million young people now registered to vote since the election was called, this could shift the result on 8 June.
The debate then shifted to the style of the leaders. And Mason noted something about May that Dale really didn’t like:
It is a fact that the PM has been refusing to do TV appearances and has actually gone missing during the election campaign. She refused to take part in the 7-way televised debate; she then backed out of BBC Radio 4 Woman’s Hour. She pulled out of all BBC Radio interviews altogether. And on Friday 2 June she nearly didn’t turn up at a pre-planned walkabout in Doncaster. Whereas Corbyn’s public campaigning and televised appearances have, in the main, been relentless.
Mason: One. Rest of the World: Nil
The debate concluded much as Maitlis hoped it wouldn’t. With each side tearing strips off each other. But while Dale used meaningless slurs about Corbyn, Mason hammered home his points about both the Labour leader and May. And Maitlis, asking which side has played the “dirtiest”, struggled to keep control:
Mason is exactly the kind of journalist Corbyn needs on his side at present. With just a matter of days until voters go to the polls, the Tory smears about Labour will probably reach fever pitch. So, cutting through fact and fiction will be crucial. And on Newsnight, Mason gave a masterclass in doing this.
– Get out there and vote on 8 June. And encourage others to do the same.
– Discuss the key policy issues with family members, colleagues and neighbours. And organise! Join (and participate in the activities of) a union, an activist group, and/or a political party.
– Also read more Canary articles on the 2017 general election.
– Support The Canary if you value the work we do.
Featured image via screengrab
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?