After rapper Akala nails the heart of UK media bias, even the BBC’s Andrew Neil is forced to agree [VIDEO]

Support us and go ad-free

After rapper Akala nailed the heart of UK media bias, even BBC host Andrew Neil was forced to agree. The renowned hip-hop artist got to the bottom of the issue:

I don’t believe complete objectivity is even philosophically possible… If I ran a news channel, even if I didn’t mean for it to, it would naturally reflect some of my passions.

The episode of This Week concerned media bias against Jeremy Corbyn. Neil, who was editor of Rupert Murdoch’s The Sunday Times for 11 years, concurred that Akala has a point:

Because you choose the agenda… and so on

Akala continued:

So if you have… similarly educated people from similar backgrounds running all of the main institutions, even if they don’t intend it, the outcome can often be… biased.

Akala, who took his stage name from the Buddhist word meaning ‘immovable’, also won over former Secretary of State for Education Michael Gove. The top Tory conceded:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

I think that’s one of your strongest points

The heart of the issue

Akala’s assessment of media bias is shared by US academic Noam Chomsky. Journalists are always biased to a degree because they must select which stories they cover. So BBC journalists who support the political establishment are not necessarily conspiring actively against Jeremy Corbyn. For Akala and Chomsky, they are selecting and framing stories in a way which contributes to a worldview they subscribe to.

And, when it comes to the UK media, the ownership is heavily concentrated:

  • Billionaire Rupert Murdoch owns The Sun and The Times.
  • The Barclay brothers, worth £7.2bn [paywall], own The Telegraph.
  • With a fortune of £2.5bn [paywall], Richard Desmond owns The Star and The Express.
  • Viscount Rothermere, whose family is worth almost a billion [paywall] runs The Daily Mail.
  • Russian billionaire Alexander Lebedev owns The Independent with his son.

Corbyn supporters

Both Akala and Chomsky have also recently come out in support of Corbyn. Among Akala’s many reasons for voting for the first time for Corbyn is:

for the first time in my adult life and perhaps for the first time in British history someone I would consider to be a fundamentally decent human being – that is, someone who does not want to kill the poor and does not routinely make a habit of rationalising the bombing and invasion of other people’s countries under the rubric of humanitarianism – has a chance of being elected.

‘They stick together’

On media bias, even the BBC show itself seemed to back up Akala’s position. The rapper was not only up against host Neil. But also two right-wing politicians: Labour’s Ed Balls and Tory Gove. At one point, the friendly banter between the two politicians was so apparent, Neil pointed out:

See how they… different parties… they stick together

Unbalanced press

Earlier in the show, Gove alluded to an equivalence between new progressive media and the traditional press:

One of areas where I disagree, is that the media is not a monolith… On the left, there are sites like The Canary and Skwawkbox… undeniably have a following, so I think there’s a greater degree of pluralism

But an audit by the Centre for Research in Communication and Culture shows Gove is wrong to suggest that coverage of Labour and the Conservatives is in any way balanced. The centre at Loughborough University has been assessing media coverage throughout the general election. The findings from the past four weeks were weighted by newspaper circulation:

As the graph shows, press coverage throughout the general election has been overwhelmingly anti-Labour. Although, there has been a shift against the Conservatives the past two weeks. Given even Tory candidates are denouncing Theresa May’s campaign as a “clusterfuck”, that’s not too surprising.

On This Week, Gove was correct that new media like The Canary has cultivated a very significant readership. But, as the graph illustrates, only an industry of online progressive outlets that matches the circulation of newspapers would cultivate balanced coverage overall.

Top-down hierarchy

But that’s not yet the case. As Akala argues, the top-down hierarchy of a media controlled by billionaires and establishment figures has a knock-on effect on coverage. And the audit by Loughborough provides part of the evidence that brings allegations of biased coverage from opinion, to fact. With the media barons behind the Conservatives, only real conversations between ordinary Britons can swing this election.

Watch Akala get to the heart of the issue:

Get Involved!

– Find out more about Akala in this 2016 interview. And check out his Hip-Hop Shakespeare Company

– Vote on 8 June: this coming Thursday

– Discuss the key policy issues with family members, colleagues and neighbours. And organise! Join (and participate in the activities of) a union, an activist group, and/or a political party.

– Also read more Canary articles on the 2017 general election.

Featured image via screenshot

Support us and go ad-free

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed