An expert in counter-terrorism has said the last two attacks could potentially have been avoided

John Shafthauer

Professor Michael Clarke, a researcher in UK counter-terrorism, has told the BBC that the last two terror attacks could potentially have been avoided.

Potentially avoidable

Among other roles, Clarke has been a specialist adviser to the House of Commons Defence Committee since 1997; was appointed to the Prime Minister’s National Security Forum in 2009; and joined the Chief of Defence Staff’s Strategic Advisory Group in 2010.

One of the London Bridge attackers, Khuram Shazad Butt, was in the Channel 4 documentary The Jihadis Next Door. The BBC put it to Clarke that people may be shocked that Butt was later able to commit a terrorist attack. Clarke responded:

I always get asked in these cases ‘could this have been prevented?’ And usually the answer is no. But in the case of the Manchester attack last month, and on this case, the answer may be yes. Because there were some red lights flashing. Certainly, [in the] case of Mr Butt, not in the [case of] the other gentleman who was named so far. But certainly with Abedi in Manchester and Butt now, it looks as if there were some indications that, on the face of it, may have been missed. And I think that will be a great concern.

Police cuts

Clarke was then asked his opinion on whether police cuts could have had an effect:

Cutting police numbers is important for all sorts of reasons, but what they miss in cutting numbers of police on the beat, as it were, is that community intelligence. The fact that, as a policeman said to me not so long ago, it’s the local butcher having a chat with you; it’s the fellers on the high-street telling you about this, telling you about that. That sort of community involvement with the police, that may have suffered because of police cuts, and that’s actually something that feeds in, not just to terrorism, but crime in general.

Unheeded advice

Following the recent attacks, the Tories have been sent a message from former police officers, police unions, and now counter-terrorism experts. Politicians like Boris Johnson are trying to paint it as a Labour vs Conservative issue. But the real issue is safety vs insecurity. And no matter who wins on 8 June, it is imperative that they actually listen to the experts.

Get Involved!

– Vote on 8 June. And encourage others to do the same.

– Discuss the key policy issues with family members, colleagues and neighbours. And organise! Join (and participate in the activities of) a union, an activist group, and/or a political party.

– You can also support The Canary if you value the work we do.

Featured image via screengrab

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed