Leaked documents have just blown the privatised rail industry’s links to government wide open [TWEETS]

Rail Industry Theresa May
Support us and go ad-free

A leaked document has exposed the links between the government and private contractors. It also shows that government procedures for conflicts of interest are deeply flawed.

“Very uncomfortable”

In January, The Guardian reported that Peter Wilkinson, former Franchising Director for the Department for Transport (DfT):

was involved in awarding the Southern, Thameslink and Great Northern franchises to Govia Thameslink Railway (GTR) in May 2014.

At the time, he was a director and the joint main shareholder of First Class Partnerships… Wilkinson had been managing the consultancy… “a leading rail industry boutique consultancy business”, since 2002, but stepped down when the government employed him as a [permanent] contractor…

[GTR] was a longstanding client of Wilkinson’s company and had been paying it for consultancy advice six months before the franchise was awarded.

Wilkinson worked on a contractual interim basis for the DfT between January 2013 and October 2014. But the DfT said that Wilkinson’s dual roles in government and at First Class Partnerships felt “very uncomfortable”. So he severed all ties with the latter, including selling his shares, and began a permanent DfT role. He is now Managing Director of DfT Passenger Services.

Since then, the National Audit Office (NAO) has begun an inquiry into the Southern, Thameslink and Great Northern franchise (known as the TSGN) run by GTR. But now, a document anonymously leaked to the Association of British Commuters (ABC) reveals that the NAO inquiry has been specifically investigating Wilkinson’s role in the contract.

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

Leaked documents

The five-page document [pdf] was given to Shadow Transport Secretary Andy McDonald in March. It details the NAO investigation into Wilkinson, stating that it’s looking into [pdf, p1]:

  • The DfT approach to preventing conflicts of interest for both interim and permanent staff.
  • Its processes related to the awarding of the GTR contracts.

The document shines a light onto exactly what went on while Wilkinson was at the DfT. You can read the full leak here. But as the ABC outlined, it shows that [pdf, p3-5]:

Essentially, Wilkinson and the DfT followed the rules regarding his appointment; rules which allow someone to be a shareholder in a company which would directly benefit from that person’s decisions in government.

Nothing to see here

A DfT spokesperson told The Canary:

We have tough safeguards in place to guard against conflicts of interest, which we have followed. The letter from the NAO makes clear we followed our established processes and found no evidence of wrongdoing. Decisions on franchise awards are taken by the department following a fair and open competition. Each franchise award is subject to thorough and independent audit.

Southern Rail and First Class Partnerships refused to comment.

The NAO should release its full report in November, and so far it has let the DfT and Wilkinson off the hook. But it has also shone a light onto what the government thinks is acceptable in terms of private companies’ involvement with it. And to many, that involvement must seem wholly unacceptable.

Correction: This article was updated at 11am on Thursday 26 October to correct an error. It previously suggested that the Southern and Thameslink franchises were separate, when in fact they fall under the individual TSGN franchise.

Get Involved!

– Passengers who’ve suffered because of a train company can contact the ABC.

– Support the Keep the Guard on the Train campaign.

– Read more from The Canary on Britain’s railways.

Featured image via Wikimedia/YouTube

Support us and go ad-free

We know everyone is suffering under the Tories - but the Canary is a vital weapon in our fight back, and we need your support

The Canary Workers’ Co-op knows life is hard. The Tories are waging a class war against us we’re all having to fight. But like trade unions and community organising, truly independent working-class media is a vital weapon in our armoury.

The Canary doesn’t have the budget of the corporate media. In fact, our income is over 1,000 times less than the Guardian’s. What we do have is a radical agenda that disrupts power and amplifies marginalised communities. But we can only do this with our readers’ support.

So please, help us continue to spread messages of resistance and hope. Even the smallest donation would mean the world to us.

Support us

Comments are closed