Chancellor Philip Hammond announced in his autumn budget statement on 22 November that he’ll increase the ‘national living wage’. But this may have duped some people into thinking they’re actually receiving one.
Hammond said during his budget speech that the government would increase the national living wage:
From April, it will rise 4.4% from £7.50 an hour to £7.83.
Former chancellor George Osborne was accused of appropriating the term ‘living wage’ from the Living Wage Foundation. The government introduced a ‘national living wage’ for all workers aged 25 or over in 2016. And they kept the national minimum wage as the minimum hourly rate that under 25-year-olds can receive by law. But the exact rate depends on their age.
Young people, who are suffering from a growing age inequality gap, will see a rise in the national minimum wage. But rates will still be as low as £3.70 an hour for an apprentice or £4.20 for a 16-to-17-year-old. And the increase still leaves the highest rate below the Living Wage Foundation’s recommendation for the real living wage – a voluntary rate of pay calculated according to what employees and their families need to live.
The real living wage currently sits at £8.75 an hour for those outside of London and £10.20 an hour within London. And there have been recent instances of workers on strike for the real living wage in order to make ends meet.
Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn has said Labour would implement a £10 an hour minimum wage by 2020. And the Green Party has called for a £10 minimum wage since 2014. In contrast, the Conservatives originally pledged a £9 an hour national living wage by 2020. It’s a target they now look set to miss [paywall].
This shows how far Hammond and the Conservative Party’s proposals are from what an actual ‘living wage’ should look like. And using the term helps distort the reality that there are still many people earning well below what they need to get by.
Featured image via Youtube
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?