Theresa May’s deal with the DUP could now cost us our human rights

Tory-DUP deal could threaten our human rights
Support us and go ad-free

Jeremy Corbyn put forward a motion for the UK to keep the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights after Brexit. But MPs voted against it and the government avoided defeat by just 10 votes. And as Jack Maidment at The Telegraph points out, all 10 Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) MPs were among those who voted against the motion.

The DUP

Theresa May’s deal with the DUP enabled her to form a minority government, propped up in parliament by 10 DUP MPs. It was considered highly controversial due to the views held by party members. The DUP has links with terrorists, its leader supports Northern Ireland’s total ban on abortion, and some of its members have strongly opposed homosexuality and gay marriage, as well as denying climate change and evolution.

Concerns that their influence would sway policy in the wrong direction now seem justified. As previously reported at The Canary, every single DUP MP also voted to exclude the term ‘animal sentience’ from UK law post-Brexit, suggesting its members don’t care about the interests of animals. This vote on the Charter of Fundamental Rights suggests that they don’t take our interests very seriously either.

Human rights 

The charter is a single document that contains the fundamental rights guaranteed by the EU. It exists to clarify the rights of EU citizens, as well as to update them.

After appeasing its backbenchers and securing the DWP vote, the government was able to vote down the motion to keep the charter with a slim majority. But many are worried. Organisations have warned that failing to reflect this charter in UK law could, as The Independent puts it, threaten:

individual rights to privacy, equality, freedom of expression, fair working conditions, a fair trial, access to a lawyer and the protection of personal data.

Tom Brake, the Liberal Democrat Brexit spokesperson, said:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

The vast majority of people do not want to see a Brexit that undermines our freedoms, equality and privacy.

And Labour MP Stephen Doughty argues that this “wafer thin” majority:

does not give them [ministers] any mandate to water down the rights of the British people.

How can the government be trusted?

Given the government’s track record when it comes to human rights, we should be wary of how it will reflect the charter in UK law, if at all. As previously reported at The Canary, the UN said the Conservatives were guilty of “grave” and “systematic” violations of the human rights of disabled people. In addition, the government has consistently violated our right to privacy.

The government says it will pay close attention to how rights are transferred from EU to UK law post-Brexit. But if we care about our fundamental rights, then we should be paying even closer attention.

Get Involved!

– Check out more articles from The Canary on the DUP.

Join us, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.

Featured image via Flickr

Support us and go ad-free

Do your bit for independent journalism

Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.

We need you to help out, if you can.

When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.

You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.

In return you get:

  • Advert free reading experience
  • Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
  • 20% discount from our shop

 

The Canary Fund us

Comments are closed