“A refreshing break from political correctness”
They've deleted this tweet because of the uproar it provoked but, once again for those at the back, the mainstream media will continue to mainstream and legitimise fascism. pic.twitter.com/9uhUtOFP6c
— Owen Jones? (@OwenJones84) October 29, 2018
We’re going to execute the Workers’ Party members here.
said in 2017 that Afro-Brazilian communities are “not even good for procreation”, calls torture a “legitimate practice”, indigenous people “parasites” and is “proud to be homophobic”. Bolsonaro also implied there could be a military coup if he didn’t get his way through Brazil’s electoral system.
Yet the BBC questions whether such views could be a “refreshing break from political correctness”. Later, the public broadcaster claimed only that the “language” of the tweet was wrong:
We have removed an earlier tweet about statements made by Brazilian Jair Bolsonaro. The intention was to reflect the spectrum of opinion on such statements but the language of the post may not have reflected this accurately.
— BBC Monitoring (@BBCMonitoring) October 29, 2018
Persecution: “bad or refreshing”?
On social media, people were shocked:
So nice for women, LGBT people and minorities to know that the BBC thinks it's a toss-up whether persecuting them is bad or "refreshing."
— Sophia McDougall (@McDougallSophia) October 29, 2018
“A real issue with the far-right”
Others pointed to the BBC’s record of appeasing the far-right:
do you see why people have a problem with how the BBC is reporting things these days? are you finally starting to see what we see? ie. the BBC sympathising with & needlessly giving a platform to the far-right? do you see how that could be perceived as biased?
— Sarah Saboteur ?? #FBPE #PeoplesVote (@sazmeister88) October 29, 2018
From portraying Yaxley-Lennon as a victim to asking if Bolsonaro is ‘refreshing’, the BBC has a real issue with the far right. This needs to be faced up to. It’s not just the social media interns at @BBCMonitoring, but the heart of @BBCNewsnight and beyond.
— Paul Bernal (@PaulbernalUK) October 29, 2018
As Paul Bernal points out, the BBC’s coverage has been sympathetic to EDL founder Stephen Yaxley-Lennon (aka Tommy Robinson). BBC Newsnight has also used imagery to reinforce the perception he’s a silenced free speech advocate:
TONIGHT: Is Tommy Robinson a man raising concerns that others ignore, or a far-right figure exploiting the victims of sexual abuse for his own ends? We look into the roots of his appeal – and where his movement is headed next.
— BBC Newsnight (@BBCNewsnight) October 11, 2018
This is a business and your outrage, valid as it is, will be monetised as such.
Yaxley-Lennon and his family now have a £500,000 house and go on regular holidays.
BBC promotes the far-right
Then there’s the BBC platforming and sympathising with far-right strategist Steve Bannon. In an email to Scottish first minister Nicola Sturgeon, the BBC described Bannon as a “powerful and influential figure…promoting an anti-elite movement”. Bannon, former chairperson of Breitbart News, stands accused of promoting and participating in racism. For example, Bannon’s ex-wife issued a sworn statement in 2007 accusing Bannon of antisemitic remarks.
Bannon was Donald Trump’s campaign strategist. And he advised Bolsonaro’s presidential campaign, unpaid.
The BBC also supported Brazil’s elite and helped amplify attacks on the Worker’s Party before.
With the ongoing collapse of free-market economics, the far-right is on the rise globally. If the mainstream media continues promoting those scapegoating minority communities, while sidelining or smearing progressives with genuine solutions, we are reaching a dangerous turning point.
– Support the Media Fund.
Featured image via FotosBolsonaro/ Flickr
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?