Ex-M16 boss ‘questions’ Corbyn’s Czech spy meetings but fails to mention his own ‘dodgy’ dealings


On 23 February, The Daily Telegraph ran a prominent story on former MI6 head Sir Richard Dearlove. Dearlove believes Jeremy Corbyn has some “questions to answer” about his meetings with a Czech diplomat.

But days earlier, a document produced in the High Court raised questions about Dearlove’s own role in a meeting he had with Libyan officials; a meeting that arguably had disastrous consequences.

Dearlove attack

Writing in The Daily Telegraph, Dearlove said [paywall] that Corbyn had “questions to answer” over his dealings with Jan Sarkocy, a Czech diplomat, later expelled as a spy. The Daily Mail recycled the story, based on allegations that have since been debunked.

In response, a spokesperson for Corbyn told the Daily Mail:

Richard Dearlove, who as head of MI6 was involved in the infamous dodgy dossier that helped take us into the disastrous Iraq War, should not be trying to give credence to these entirely false and ridiculous smears.

Tory MP Ben Bradley, meanwhile, issued an unreserved apology for his part in the smears:

Read on...

Dearlove also criticised Corbyn in June 2017. He stated that Corbyn was ‘”unfit” to govern and “represents a clear and present danger to the country”.

The Libyan episode

The High Court hearing that referenced Dearlove is the latest in a case brought by Abdel Hakim Belhaj against former foreign secretary Jack Straw, former senior MI6 division head Sir Mark Allen, and MI6. During the hearing, a Libyan External Security Organisation document was produced. The document, published by Middle East Eye, bears Dearlove’s name on the heading. It provides details of an alleged secret meeting he attended in Libya between MI6 and Libyan officials.

Soon after that meeting, Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) leader Belhaj and his wife Fatima Bouchar were kidnapped by the CIA. They were renditioned (via the British Indian Ocean Territory of Diego Garcia) to Libya. There, they were jailed and tortured. Papers produced in court showed that an MI6 officer flew to Tripoli within days of the rendition to ask about Belhaj’s “cooperation”. That same officer reportedly told her Libyan counterparts about the location of another LIFG leader, Abu Munthir al-Saadi, who (with his family) was also renditioned.

On 18 March 2004, Allen wrote to Libya’s spy chief Moussa Koussa applauding the co-operation between Libya and Britain on the rendition. A week later, Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi and British prime minister Tony Blair met to seal a deal on future relations.

Al-Saadi and Belhaj were imprisoned by the Gaddafi regime for seven years.

But less than a decade earlier, Britain was “covertly supporting” Libyan rebel forces. In 2017, The Canary published a top secret MI6 cable [pdf] from 1996 showing [pdf] that relevant British government departments were briefed on a plot to assassinate Gaddafi. And a comprehensive dossier on the background to Britain’s links with foreign and UK-based extremists went on to claim that the perpetrators of that plot were members of the LIFG. Moreover, it’s alleged that the plotters were funded by MI6.


After the recent court hearing, Cori Crider (of human rights group Reprieve) asked:

Did Gaddafi ask Blair to help him target dissidents? Why did Number 10 send an emissary to meet Libyan spies just weeks before the abduction? What really happened at Dearlove’s set-piece presentation to Gaddafi?

Dearlove had his own perspective:

It was a political decision, having very significantly disarmed Libya, for the government to cooperate with Libya on Islamist terrorism. The whole relationship was one of serious calculation about where the overall balance of our national interests stood.

In 2010, the LIFG disbanded. Former members then went on to form the Islamic Movement for Change. Not long after, Britain did an about-turn and, together with France and the US, provided air and other support to rebel forces. Within months, Gaddafi was dead.

Disastrous consequences

In 2011, MI5 reportedly facilitated the travel of British Libyans, many associated with the LIFG, back to Libya. The man identified as the perpetrator of the Manchester Arena bombing was allegedly affiliated to the remnants of LIFG’s more radical elements.

Former MI5 intelligence analyst Annie Machon claims the bomber and his family were given “sanctuary” by British authorities in the 1990s. She also said that Britain allowed members of his family to return to Libya to fight against Gaddafi. And she went one step further, suggesting the bomber was “allowed” to “fly under the radar”:

Journalist Paul Mason concurred:

It is now reported that MI5 was facilitating the travel of non-jihadi British Libyans to fight in Tripoli. The minister responsible for that decision would have been May. Did she ask about the impact of the Libyan fighting on the terror threat here?

Put into perspective, Dearlove’s concerns about Corbyn’s alleged meetings with a Czech diplomat appear utterly insignificant. Especially when taking into account the disastrous consequences of MI6’s involvement in Libyan affairs.

Featured image via Flickr/Alex France

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed