The DWP just issued a slap in the face to grieving parents

A graveyard and the DWP logo
Steve Topple

The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) has quietly confirmed that some grieving parents are not entitled to support – issuing a slap in the face to up to 1.3 million families.

The DWP: heartless reforms

As The Canary previously reported, in April 2017 the government cut bereavement support payments for widowed parents. Previously, they would have got a £2,000 one-off payment in the event of a partner’s death. The DWP used to supplement this with a weekly payment of £112, until the youngest child left full-time education. This was payable for anything up to 20 years and known as Bereavement Allowance.

Changes in former chancellor George Osborne’s 2015 budget saw the one-off payment increase to £3,500, but the weekly payment reduce to around £80. The DWP now only pays the weekly amount for a maximum of 18 months. It’s called the Bereavement Support Payment.

But crucially, Bereavement Support Payments are not open to the 1.3 million co-habiting families in the UK with dependent children. And on 25 June, the DWP confirmed it would not be changing its mind.

A cold response

On 13 June Baroness Altmann asked the government:

why cohabiting couples with young children are not eligible for Bereavement Support Payments.

Parliamentary under-secretary at the DWP Baroness Buscombe said that:

Marriage and civil partnerships are legal contracts that are associated with certain rights, including inheritance, recognition in the tax system and entitlement to certain benefits.

A key principle of the National Insurance system is that all rights to benefits derived from another person’s contributions are based on the concept of legal marriage or civil partnership.

Moreover, proving that cohabitation existed could be a complex process likely to cause distress at a time of bereavement.

However, cohabitees do have access to income-related benefits. They may also qualify for help with funeral costs from the Social Fund…

Contentious cuts

The very fact that the DWP acknowledges it gives some co-habiting couples benefits is cruelly hypocritical.

The cuts to the benefit themselves were contentious enough. As the Childhood Bereavement Network noted, 88% of widowed parents are £12,000 worse off under the new scheme, and 91% are supported for a shorter time.

But now, the DWP is potentially abandoning 1.3 million families, and one charity is not happy.

Abandoned

Georgia Elms from the charity WAY Widowed and Young told The Canary:

We believe it is absolutely unjust that co-habiting couples are not entitled to receive the same financial lifeline as married couples, who have paid exactly the same amount into the National Insurance pot from which this money is drawn. Their children are being penalised and discriminated against for a choice made by their parents – many of whom are simply unaware that their decision not to get married would have such a devastating financial impact on their family if one of the couple happens to die. Many WAY Widowed & Young members agree that this system is not fit for the 21st century and needs to be changed immediately to protect bereaved families from more financial and emotional hardship in future.

The DWP had previously said that the old Bereavement Allowance was “outdated”. Yet by not recognising co-habiting parents, it hasn’t kept up with modern family life either.

Get Involved!

– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.

Featured image via Matthew Murdoch – Flickr and UK government – Wikimedia 

We need your help ...

The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.

Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.

We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.

Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?

The Canary Support us

Comments are closed