‘Horrifying’ new rule keeps corruption and sexual harassment in parliament a secret

Parliament at daytime.
Support us and go ad-free

MPs have voted through a “horrifying” new rule that keeps corruption and sexual harassment investigations in parliament a secret. At times, Westminster can keep the public in the dark even if the inquiry finds the politician guilty.

Kept secret: even if the politician is guilty

If the complaint is upheld, the Mirror reports, the Parliamentary Standards Commissioner must consider “proportion” and the offending politician’s “reputation” when deciding whether to publish the result. That’s the case if both the commissioner and a new complaints scheme are involved.

If only the commissioner is involved, Westminster will publish the results at the end of the investigation, no matter the outcome.

Other policies

Most parties backed the proposals. As a result, the ‘current inquiries’ link on the parliamentary website has already vanished. The page identified MPs currently under probe.

The new anonymity rule passed through parliament with a raft of other policies. These include [paywall] a code of behaviour for MPs, an independent helpline for harassment, and mandatory training for less serious incidents.

“Deeply worrying”

MPs had a chance to vote for an amendment to the proposals, which would stop anonymity applying to all investigations.

Caroline Lucas, one of 22 MPs to vote for the amendment, told the Commons:

Read on...

Support us and go ad-free

the optics of this House rolling back transparency are deeply worrying.

Two of Theresa May’s ministers resigned over scandals only last year. Former defence secretary Michael Fallon resigned after a complaint of sexual assault, according to senior Conservative MP Anna Soubry. And former first secretary of state Damian Green stood down after lying about pornography found on his office computer.

Campaigner Rachel Swindon was not impressed by the new rule, saying on Twitter:

This is quite horrifying… Transparency is dead.

Expanding transparency vs rolling it back

The new rule means that even guilty politicians could potentially keep their misconduct a secret.

Adopting any avenue for a politician to hide corruption or sexual harassment means parliamentarians could game the system.

We should be expanding transparency, not keeping the public in the dark.

Get Involved!

– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.

Featured image via Rennett Stowe/ Flickr

Support us and go ad-free

Do your bit for independent journalism

Did you know that less than 1.5% of our readers contribute financially to The Canary? Imagine what we could do if just a few more people joined our movement to achieve a shared vision of a free and fair society where we nurture people and planet.

We need you to help out, if you can.

When you give a monthly amount to fund our work, you are supporting truly independent journalism. We hold power to account and have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence the counterpoint to the mainstream.

You can count on us for rigorous journalism and fearless opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right wing mainstream media.

In return you get:

  • Advert free reading experience
  • Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
  • 20% discount from our shop


The Canary Fund us

Comments are closed