A hunt allegedly killed two foxes within days of each other. The incidents have caused a public outcry and once again raised concerns over the ban on hunting. And this time, even a police boss is calling for stronger laws.
Four days, two deaths
Graphic images of a dead fox appeared on 5 January. Cheshire Hunt Saboteurs claimed the Cheshire Hunt was responsible for killing the animal.
The incident reached mainstream news including the BBC, Guardian and ITV. It prompted Chester MP Chris Matheson to call for jail time for the culprits and “[b]etter still an outright ban on fox hunting”. Cheshire Police later said it had launched an investigation into the incident.
“A terrifying experience”
Laura Wyatt, a member of the public present at the 5 January incident, spoke to The Canary about what happened:
I can’t stop thinking about the fox that I saw, wrapped up in a blanket with her guts hanging out and her skull crushed. She’d been dumped in the canal by the Whipper-In – no use any longer and just disposed of – whilst commenting to one of the Cheshire Hunt Monitors, ‘Do you need a tissue?’ Callous and completely unfeeling, although unsurprising. … It was actually a terrifying experience – extremely intimidating and it seemed that the hunt supporters enjoyed winding up the sabs by shouting abuse and jeering…
She also said officers present seemed unable to police the Hunting Act:
There were two police officers present at the point of the kill, although the male officer I questioned denied seeing it happen. The police, although friendly in emotional circumstances, were unable to explain the process going forward after a fox had been killed. They were there to calm the situation, but there were no arrests made and the Hunt was allowed to continue on – surely the Hunt should have been stopped at this point?
In light of her experience, Wyatt went on to question the strength of the hunting ban:
What can we do to ensure that Cheshire Police finally prosecute? I believe that they have never prosecuted anyone for hunting, contrary to the Hunting Act, and have only ever passed one file to the Crown Prosecution Services. How is that even possible with all the evidence that has been passed to the police?
Police boss wants change
On 7 December 2018, The Canary reported on a statement made by Cheshire’s police and crime commissioner (PCC) David Keane that “current legislation… presents challenges to investigators and prosecutors”. As a result, Keane said he wanted to see “legislative change… progressed through parliament”.
The Canary contacted Keane’s office in light of the Cheshire Hunt’s two alleged kills. He said:
I am aware of the hunting related incidents which have taken place over recent days and have been contacted by a range of residents and their representatives expressing their concerns. The investigation of allegations related to any illegal activity, including those of illegal hunting, is the responsibility of the acting chief constable and the officers and staff under her command. The constabulary is aware of the allegations and in my role as police and crime commissioner in holding the chief constable to account, I will be seeking an overview of the investigation and any outcomes from those leading it. The acting chief constable is fully aware of my expectation that such incidents are thoroughly and robustly investigated.
The Canary also asked what the PCC’s commitment means in light of the kills on 5 and 8 January. The PCC responded:
Following the independent review I commissioned into illegal hunting in Cheshire, I will be holding a scrutiny meeting in public next month to discuss the outcomes of this review and the subsequent action plan to ensure Cheshire Constabulary is upholding its responsibilities under the Hunting Act 2004. I have also written to Cheshire MPs to highlight a need for legislative change. In the meantime, I would urge anyone who has evidence of any criminal activity relating to illegal hunting to contact Cheshire Police.
Hunt in denial
A spokesperson for the Cheshire Hunt denied allegations it was responsible for the death of the fox. They claimed the death occurred “solely due to the presence of anti-hunting protesters who were interfering with the hounds”.
But Cheshire Hunt Saboteurs ridiculed this. Speaking to The Canary, the group said:
The goal of the hunt is to rip a fox apart, we are very aware of how to use our tactics to prevent this. However, the huntsman will always have the upper hand in controlling the pack and we can’t always call off the hounds… We can only try to use calls to call them off… in no way do we cause the death of a fox with our tactics. The cause of the fox being ripped apart by foxhounds is of course the fox hunt who chase and kill foxes every week.
How many more deaths?
Less than two weeks into 2019, activists have already connected hunts to several illegal acts. On 7 January, the Hunt Saboteurs Association published video it said showed terrier men connected with the Kimblewick Hunt throwing a trapped fox to hounds. On 5 January, the Lamerton Hunt allegedly hunted illegally after meeting at the home of attorney general Geoffrey Cox. And anti-hunt protesters were subject to assaults from hunt supporters in Cornwall on New Year’s Day.
Activists have shown that hunts and their supporters consistently commit harmful, often illegal, acts. It’s clear the Hunting Act has done little if anything to stop hunts from continuing their barbaric activities. How many more deaths have to happen before this changes? Scotland is now taking steps to get rid of the loopholes in its hunting ban. The same must happen in England and Wales.
Featured image via Laura Wyatt
We need your help to keep speaking the truth
Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.
Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.
We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.
In return, you get:
* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop
Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.
With your help we can continue:
* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do
We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?