Appeals will be free but there’ll be ‘no U-turn’ on grading system, says Gavin Williamson

Schools in England will be able to appeal against A-level and GCSE grades free of charge, according to education secretary Gavin Williamson.

His announcement came amid further criticism of the government’s handling of the exams system, after thousands of pupils in England had their results downgraded.

“Deluge” of appeals

Williamson told the Times:

I do not want a youngster to feel they are in a situation where there is a strong and legitimate case for grounds for appeal, but an appeal is not made on grounds of cost.

That would be a real, shocking injustice.

You will have obviously a large number of appeals. But I would rather have a strong, robust fair appeals process that makes sure that youngsters get the grades that they deserve as against being in a situation where there is an injustice that carries on.

But he again said there would be “no U-turn” on the grading system, claiming this would “severely erode” the value of qualifications and lead to grade inflation.

Read on...

Making appeals free may not be enough, as shadow education secretary Kate Green has warned there could be a “deluge” of appeals from students unhappy with their A-level results. She said it may prove impossible to get them all processed in time for students to take up their university places.

Protests and internal criticism

Protesters gathered outside Downing Street on Friday 14 August chanting for Williamson to be sacked, a call echoed by some opposition MPs. But prime minister Boris Johnson is backing Williamson. He has insisted that he has confidence in Williamson and described the system as “robust”.

Yet some conservative MPs have voiced their concerns about the process used by exam regulator Ofqual to moderate A-level results. Robert Syms suggested the Westminster government may have to follow Scotland’s lead if the appeals procedure failed to deal with the issues. The SNP-led administration at Holyrood opted to allow results estimated by teachers to be accepted.

Robert Halfon, the Conservative chairman of the Commons Education Committee, earlier expressed concern that Ofqual’s model to moderate A-level results penalised disadvantaged students. He called on the regulator to publish details of the algorithm it used to make its calculations. Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s The World At One programme, he said:

I am worried about it because some figures suggest that disadvantaged students have been penalised again.

I am also worried about further education colleges, because they have been improving in recent years and yet they seem also to have suffered under this grading system.

If the model has penalised disadvantaged groups this is very serious and if it has disadvantaged colleges that has to be looked at. Ofqual will have to adjust the grades.

Opposition response

Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham said he’s considering a legal challenge against Ofqual over the “unfair” A-level results process, given the impact on pupils in his region.

Ofqual has said that a “rare few centres” put in “implausibly high judgments”, and said that an appeals process is in place to correct any mistakes.

Meanwhile, Labour leader Keir Starmer tweeted:

Liberal Democrat education spokeswoman Layla Moran called for Williamson to step down from his role with immediate effect. She said:

Gavin Williamson is an education secretary out of his depth and out of excuses. He must take responsibility for his mistakes and step down with immediate effect.

Our young people and our country cannot afford these blunders to continue into September, ahead of a potential second wave.

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. OFQUAL and WJEC invented all this nonsense and algorith to keep them busy for the past 5 months. They’ve had no exams to organise and no exam marks to correlate, so they’ve needed something to avoid furloughing and redundancies.

      The students affected are individuals whose lives will be put in turmoil by this – they’re not numbers in a computer algorithm.

      All those involved should apologise and resign.

    2. This absurd mathematical algorithm designed with its seemingly despicable elitist intent to differentiate ‘the good from the bad’ makes of public school students the elite winners who keep on winning. And, this time they’ve won even more glittering top-of-the-pile plaudits with exam outcomes thanks to a Tory algorithm. While, state school students, where even if many through socio-economic circumstance are the sink estate and social-housing losers as usual through no fault of their own, have lost even more – in some instances with intolerable downgrading of their exam results. This time around during added horrendous Covid times witnesses state school’s having their downgraded results justified by ‘outrageous mathematics’ – being an algorithm that has to have been dreamed up, surely, by some grey grubby nondescript ‘mathematical genius’ of a government department stooge who’s ‘good at numbers’? There couldn’t be a more elitist mathematical model rubber-stamping exam outcomes that has separated out with stark algorithmic indifferent robotic means the disparity between our UK society’s ‘young haves’ and ‘young have nots’.

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.