It took Sarah Everard’s murder for Met Police to examine sexual misconduct and abuse claims against officers

Following Sarah Everard’s murder, the Metropolitan police are finally going to examine all current cases of sexual misconduct or domestic abuse allegations against London’s police officers.

Cressida Dick, commissioner for the force, announced on 8 October that they’re launching the investigation. Dick added that similar allegations made against officers and workers at the force over the last 10 years will also be reviewed.

‘Institutional corruption’

But Dick herself has been accused of “presiding over a culture of incompetence and cover-up”. Her response to a panel which found ‘institutional corruption’ in the Met was described as “most disappointing”.

Officers from the force’s Directorate of Professional Standards will analyse each of the cases internally. And they’ll undertake a thorough check of the vetting history of Met Police staff involved in the claims.

Dick told the PA news agency:

We’ll be reviewing [the allegations] to make sure that the victim has been properly supported, and that the investigation is suitably thorough.

Read on...

We’ll also be going back to look at some of those [historic] investigations just to make sure that the processes that should have taken place have taken place and that we are taking the right management action after the case is closed.

‘Undermined trust’

The force said in a statement that the examination was being held in the aftermath Everard’s murder by former Met Police officer Wayne Couzens and other cases that have “undermined trust”. It’s been launched in addition to an independent review into the Met’s culture by baroness Casey of Blackstock.

The announcement came as Dick undertook a walkabout in Battersea Park, south-west London, with two female officers on 8 October. She also addressed a report in the Times newspaper which says home secretary Priti Patel has set Dick three key targets to meet in order to keep her job.

Dick told the PA news agency:

There were a number of things that the Home Secretary has discussed with me and I’ve discussed with her about how we can work most effectively together in the future, but we share the same priorities.

A history of calamity

Dick recently presided over the “excessive” and “disproportionate” use of force against women holding a vigil in Sarah Everard’s memory. The police officers, whose colleague killed Everard, went on to ‘breach the human rights’ of those honouring her memory. These were officers under Dick’s command.

Dick said conversations were had in the run-up to her contract being extended with London mayor Sadiq Khan. She added that the trio are all focused on “the same things”, including reducing violence in the capital and preventing violence against women and girls. Asked again about the reports, Dick said the conversations she had with Patel were “private” and she wouldn’t comment on them further.

We need your help to keep speaking the truth

Every story that you have come to us with; each injustice you have asked us to investigate; every campaign we have fought; each of your unheard voices we amplified; we do this for you. We are making a difference on your behalf.

Our fight is your fight. You’ve supported our collective struggle every time you gave us a like; and every time you shared our work across social media. Now we need you to support us with a monthly donation.

We have published nearly 2,000 articles and over 50 films in 2021. And we want to do this and more in 2022 but we don’t have enough money to go on at this pace. So, if you value our work and want us to continue then please join us and be part of The Canary family.

In return, you get:

* Advert free reading experience
* Quarterly group video call with the Editor-in-Chief
* Behind the scenes monthly e-newsletter
* 20% discount in our shop

Almost all of our spending goes to the people who make The Canary’s content. So your contribution directly supports our writers and enables us to continue to do what we do: speaking truth, powered by you. We have weathered many attempts to shut us down and silence our vital opposition to an increasingly fascist government and right-wing mainstream media.

With your help we can continue:

* Holding political and state power to account
* Advocating for the people the system marginalises
* Being a media outlet that upholds the highest standards
* Campaigning on the issues others won’t
* Putting your lives central to everything we do

We are a drop of truth in an ocean of deceit. But we can’t do this without your support. So please, can you help us continue the fight?

The Canary Support us
  • Show Comments
    1. I see The Guardian now uses the word ‘fury’ with the same meaning it used to have for the Daily Sport, i.e. ‘complete lack of fury’ or ‘we are fabricating the presence of fury to fit what we’ve helped facilitate in our readers until now’.

      The idea that she’d suddenly be capable of fury about all this is cranky.

      So, to recap, that’s:

      ‘Independent’ – ‘not at all independent’
      ‘fury’ – ‘absence of all fury’
      ‘levelling up’ – ‘not doing anything’
      ‘democracy’ – ‘dismantling of legal aid, fake police watchdog, fake ombudsmen, dozens of right-wing tabloid and TV stations, mentally unstable police officers, water cannons in a lock-up garage somewhere, Prevent, Line of Duty and Coronation Street storylines portraying the availability of police oversight, no Philosophy classes in schools but RE, an opposition party almost completely filled with sleeper agents, placatory drugs everywhere, pseudo-alternative cultures and mainstream promotion of these portraying those drugs as ‘cool’, military grooming children in ‘Careers’ lessons, false portrayal of ‘County Lines’ dealing being tackled when the policing system actively fosters all crime of State benefit, shops full of docility-inducing foods’
      ‘radicalised’ – ‘mentally active and in possession of a soul’
      ‘local government’ – ’embezzlers’
      ‘councillor’ – ’embezzler’
      ‘MP’ – ’embezzler’
      ‘prime minister’ – ’embezzler’
      ’embezzler’ -‘scapegoat to obscure naturalised embezzlement throughout society’

    Leave a Reply

    Join the conversation

    Please read our comment moderation policy here.