Viewers have branded the BBC “dangerously irresponsible” for apparently burying a gamechanger in the Russian spy story in its broadcast coverage:
The @BBCNews at 6 o'clock headlines. Not a single mention of the announcement from Porton Down.
The BBC has moved way past biased, it is now dangerously irresponsible and complicit in government lying to the public.
— Matt Thomas #GTTO (@Trickyjabs) April 3, 2018
More than 20 countries have expelled Russian diplomats over the UK’s position that Russia poisoned former double agent Sergei Skripal in Salisbury. Backing the allegation, foreign secretary Boris Johnson said that people from the UK’s Defence Science and Technology Laboratory “were absolutely categorical” that the Novichok nerve agent used to poison Skripal came from Russia.
But on 3 April, the chief executive of the UK’s government laboratory, headquartered at Porton Down, told Sky News that the agency has “not verified the precise source” of the nerve agent.
Two hours after Porton Down announced that the scientific evidence was inconclusive, BBC News at Six ignored the development. Instead, the programme attacked Jeremy Corbyn for attending a Passover feast with a Jewish group. With the apparent double standard in mind, social media is awash with complaints from viewers:
Given the wall-to-wall coverage you relayed of the Skripal poisonings, the jingoism of May and Johnson and the attempts to humiliate Jeremy Corbyn, do you not think it is in the public interest to inform them of the latest developments at Porton Down? @BBCNews
— Twenty8Sixty8 (@WPMTESE) April 4, 2018
This a resignation issue for Johnson? Apparently it isn't even newsworthy enough to put on the BBC 6 o'clock News. Uh @BBCNews? However, Corbyn accepting an invitation to spend Seder supper with his constituents on his day off, THAT'S TERRIBLE! #BBCBias https://t.co/qXQqViiBHf
— I Am Nothing 🌹 #GTTO (@AKA_Porlek) April 3, 2018
6’0clock @BBCNews decided not to mention the recent findings from Porton Down.
These findings are not insignificant.
Why not reported? Why??
— MagsNews (@MagsNews) April 3, 2018
Can @BBCNews explain why it failed to mention anything on the 6 o’clock news about today’s findings from Porton Down that the origin of the nerve agent used in Salisbury cannot be identified?
Could it be because today’s findings are seriously embarrassing for the government? pic.twitter.com/KeZFCTcxYv
— Socialist Voice #GTTO (@SocialistVoice) April 3, 2018
After Skripal was poisoned, The Canary reported that there was no available evidence conclusively pointing to any culprit in the Russian spy case. Now, Porton Down has confirmed that the institution hasn’t attributed the nerve agent to any state. In response, the UK government says that Porton Down was “only one part of the intelligence picture”. The defence laboratory takes the same line.
Fast forward to BBC News at Ten, and the state broadcaster still appeared to be sidelining the revelation.
One journalist accused the BBC of dedicating much more time to Corbyn attending a Jewish dinner and Prince Philip having a hip operation than to the Porton Down development. And he criticised BBC News for failing to hold the foreign secretary to account for claiming Porton Down “categorically” said the nerve agent came from Russia:
Tonight's BBC News at 10:
– London shooting yesterday [4m40s]
– Corbyn DEFENDS (!) attending Jewish dinner [3m20s]
– Prince Philip's hip op #really [2m10s]
– Porton Down scientists can't confirm Salisbury nerve gas source [1m50s]
– Boris Johnson lied to the UK public [0m0s]
— Hicham Yezza (@HichamYezza) April 3, 2018
I can't understand what the Porton Down guy has got to do to get on BBC News. Maybe fling fish from a trawler, or cheat at cricket?
— James Kelly (@JamesKelly) April 3, 2018
Porton Down: That awkward moment when Jeremy Corbyn was – again – on the right side of history and the BBC have to somehow find a way to make him the villian.
— Johnny Foreigner (@EskimoBob3) April 3, 2018
Last month, BBC Newsnight painted Corbyn as an apologist for Russia for asking for evidence before reacting to the assassination attempt:
Remember this episode of Newsnight, memorably known because everyone on Twitter became obsessed with Corbyn's hat while being less bothered by the fact that @BBCNewsnight staged Jeremy in front of the Kremlin? THREAD on #PortonDown pic.twitter.com/SxFC2Kb4kW
— Chris Williamson MP #GTTO (@DerbyChrisW) April 3, 2018
A BBC spokesperson told The Canary:
The story was covered extensively across BBC News outlets yesterday, including prominently on the News at 10 with our security correspondent, Frank Gardner. We have continued to cover the story this morning and the foreign secretary’s comments have been discussed, for example, on Radio 4’s Today programme.
BBC losing trust of public?
The BBC has extensively covered attacks on Corbyn. But now, the state broadcaster seems to be downplaying an important development in the Russian spy story. Quite rightly, viewers are outraged at where their licence fee money is going. A recent survey of British adults by One Poll found that only 17% of respondents trust the BBC. That’s not a good sign for our public service broadcaster. The BBC should be democratised, not run like an arm of the establishment.
– You can make a complaint to the BBC here.
– Join The Canary, so we can keep holding the powerful to account.
– Read and support other independent media outlets:
Media Diversified, Novara Media, Corporate Watch, Red Pepper, New Internationalist, Common Space, Media Lens, Bella Caledonia, Vox Political, Evolve Politics, Real Media, Reel News, STRIKE! magazine, The Bristol Cable, The Meteor, The Skwawkbox, Salford Star, The Ferret.
Featured image via Flickr/ Andy Roberts and screengrab
We need your help ...
The coronavirus pandemic is changing our world, fast. And we will do all we can to keep bringing you news and analysis throughout. But we are worried about maintaining enough income to pay our staff and minimal overheads.
Now, more than ever, we need a vibrant, independent media that holds the government to account and calls it out when it puts vested economic interests above human lives. We need a media that shows solidarity with the people most affected by the crisis – and one that can help to build a world based on collaboration and compassion.
We have been fighting against an establishment that is trying to shut us down. And like most independent media, we don’t have the deep pockets of investors to call on to bail us out.
Can you help by chipping in a few pounds each month?